I didn't claim that all minorities are incompetent, which is trivially demonstrable. Some of the best programmers in the world are East Asian, for instance.

I said the Code of Conduct is intended to enable the entryism of incompetent minorities, which it objectively does.

well put HorizonoziroH

You can read the Code of Conduct and see for yourself that I reported on it factually.

See:

https://github.com/todogroup/opencodeofconduct/blob/gh-pages/index.md

or

http://todogroup.org/opencodeofconduct/

It's the same document. The former is the Markdown source. The latter is the pretty HTML produced from it.

Specifically:

Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort. We will not act on complaints regarding:

• ‘Reverse’ -isms, including ‘reverse racism,’ ‘reverse sexism,’ and ‘cisphobia’
• Reasonable communication of boundaries, such as “leave me alone,” “go away,” or “I’m not discussing this with you”
• Refusal to explain or debate social justice concepts
• Communicating in a ‘tone’ you don’t find congenial
• Criticizing racist, sexist, cissexist, or otherwise oppressive behavior or assumptions

This section declares open season for harassment, abuse, threats, and other criminal behavior by minorities against straight white males without consequences.

frankenmine covers the actual CoC quite well.

In addition, you have major "events" recently happening when so called "social justice warriors" have clashed with "the stereotypical (possibly libertarian leaning due to open source) coder" on open source projects that can provide a little bit of a background environment to this all.

Opal Issue 941. The FreeBSD Chatlog. Or effectively removing someone from the python cuba group for criticising a block list that was used for the OSCON twitter handle that blew up on twitter, which is better documented in a series of python cuba emails, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, with a tweet. These are just some examples, coupled with the most recent see what happens when due to content restrictions, we can't use terms like "retards", so lets call everyone "gits" instead.

So yeah, when you look at reddit, at github, at what the message is being pushed in the media, you are starting to see a cultural shift for a more strict, less wild west internet (and this is coming from someone who lives in a country that has codified criminal hate speech, and online harassment). The fact that the hacker manifesto flat out calls this debate as bullshit is telling. And yes, I first was introduced to through the movie Hackers, but is better seen in action by Julia Stiles.

If you really want a too long, didn't read: you are seeing, distilled into its purist, most nonsensical form, fascists versus anarchists. Or authoritarians versus libertarians. EDIT: Made some spelling mistakes. Woops.

Also, free speech does not include obscene speech.

Obscene speech involves, for instance, porn depicting pissing, scat, torture, etc. Calling someone a retard, or any purely verbal/written expression, for that matter, has never been considered anywhere near obscene. You are outright lying here.

So, I accept it so I can continue to use their free services.

You are one among a very tiny and unrepresentative fringe. You do not speak for the masses. You most certainly do not speak for me. Those of us who demand that our universal human rights and dignity be respected will not accept this. We will fight back.