I'm probably a bit ignorant to the design vision of Go but I thought part of their philosophy was to avoid dynamic linking... did they go back on that decision or is there another design rationale that supercedes the original stance on dynamic linking?
1 comment
0 u/mwolf 20 Aug 2015 00:47
I'm probably a bit ignorant to the design vision of Go but I thought part of their philosophy was to avoid dynamic linking... did they go back on that decision or is there another design rationale that supercedes the original stance on dynamic linking?