Apart from EasyScreenCast and ShellShape, all the functionality of those extensions is part of a stock KDE, which is why I don't understand this sentence:
Some monsters like a KDE is not a bad choice if you “need more”
KDE has less memory footprint than plain GNOME.
Another issue is that in the past GNOME extensions have stopped working after upgrades. How many of these extensions will still work in a year?
Some of these extensions seem to only re-create features that were removed from GNOME.
2 comments
1 u/clickbot 06 Oct 2015 07:22
Apart from EasyScreenCast and ShellShape, all the functionality of those extensions is part of a stock KDE, which is why I don't understand this sentence:
KDE has less memory footprint than plain GNOME.
Another issue is that in the past GNOME extensions have stopped working after upgrades. How many of these extensions will still work in a year?
Some of these extensions seem to only re-create features that were removed from GNOME.
0 u/quadrangularis 18 Oct 2015 04:44
this site is off the hook!