And the line, near the end: "By now, you should have a finished site that is alive and kicking and a client that is (hopefully) satisfied." is rediculous.
Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease scale is 70.9, so the complexity of the writing is that of a 12 year old child in the US education system. But even that is just a score of syllable complexity. You have quite a few run on sentences. Your fog index is 7, a minimal fog index of 8 is for universal consumability by english readers. In terms of characters per word your automated readability index is a 4, this is a 1:1 with the US educational system reading grade level, so grade 4, a nine year old in terms of age.
Writing isn't about numbers. It's about conveying something useful. And btw: those are OK scores. But they don't take into account that I've posted a bunch of site titles and computer jargon in there. So they're flawed. A better score would be close to 30 (FK).
But something tells me that you're here just to troll, so I'll pretend that you actually wanted to help. Fuckwad.
6 comments
0 u/ggolemg 04 Mar 2015 15:24
Seems to be a poorly written list of lists.
And the line, near the end: "By now, you should have a finished site that is alive and kicking and a client that is (hopefully) satisfied." is rediculous.
0 u/ennyo [OP] 04 Mar 2015 16:49
I wrote this. Can you tell me exactly what is "poorly written" about it? Thanks
1 u/ggolemg 04 Mar 2015 17:54
Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease scale is 70.9, so the complexity of the writing is that of a 12 year old child in the US education system. But even that is just a score of syllable complexity. You have quite a few run on sentences. Your fog index is 7, a minimal fog index of 8 is for universal consumability by english readers. In terms of characters per word your automated readability index is a 4, this is a 1:1 with the US educational system reading grade level, so grade 4, a nine year old in terms of age.
0 u/ennyo [OP] 04 Mar 2015 18:43
You took the article and ran it through an automated test? LOL
0 u/ggolemg 04 Mar 2015 18:44
You didn't before publishing it? LOL
0 u/ennyo [OP] 05 Mar 2015 00:18
Writing isn't about numbers. It's about conveying something useful. And btw: those are OK scores. But they don't take into account that I've posted a bunch of site titles and computer jargon in there. So they're flawed. A better score would be close to 30 (FK).
But something tells me that you're here just to troll, so I'll pretend that you actually wanted to help. Fuckwad.