The pattern is there is no pattern.

>This action was performed by a bot which does not check the context of your comment. lol

The fact that this guy is the front runner for the Democratic party is what makes our political system laughable. Anyone besides him would be acceptable.

Their rules even said "this isn't a debate sub." Kinda goes against what conservatism is with that rule

This is such a touchy topic. I'm a bit of both on this issue. I don't like the thought of abortion because from what I've read, it is a process that does end the life of a child in the womb. That being said, if you are willing to accept that not only are you ending a life but also hurting your chances of having a healthy baby in the future, do what you want to do. Free country. I may think that it's wrong, but I'm, not going to tell someone to no do something just because I disagree with it.

I read that this morning. Seemed like a perfectly solid answer

I say we do a vote of no confidence. I get it, mods have lives/jobs outside of Reddit. But this is sorta a part time job. If ya can't do it, then get someone else to do so.

Dude sometimes movies bomb. It happens. Surpressing it just makes em look even worse.

Dude, relax. In todays politcal climate (MeToo), I pointed out that someone can make accusations about another person and have seen these public individuals come under fire for it and have their lives fall apart. If this was done six years ago, it would not have the same effect as today, which is why I pointed out to "why now" > Y'all need to understand that if he was innocent then he'd likely have fought to keep whatever position he was in. He hasn't even had enough time to get a lawyer to go through due process to confirm his guilt and people are already saying that he did it. > Trump does it and he's not even innocent. Entirely irrelevant comparison to the whole conversation

I am saying that because she tweeted the alleged incident, without any other proof other than her word, Diaz is not only in the public spotlight but also losing his chairmanship based on that Tweet. Not giving Diaz even the opportunity to defend himself from an accusation like this is both reactionary and unfair.

> she tweeted that he cornered and kissed her against her will 6 years ago. This is what gets to me. 6 years ago. I'm not saying she is lying, but 6 years? Why wait until RIGHT NOW?