I didn't disagree that climate change was happening, just pointed out a peer reviewed study that disproves the 97% narrative. in response I got a wall of text. classic leftist ideologue response. I also didn't point out that Cook [et.al](https://et.al) has had many of his "scientific studies" just straight dropped for lacking any factual basis.. but his 97% must be flawless. Its fine. dude can be mad. Time will tell who's correct.

I didn't even start with the condescension, champ. Taking the L and walking away with a participation trophy was never a thing in school for me.

He did an excellent rage post. Really solid motivation there. Aside from.attacking my character because I had the audacity to not suckle at the teat of the 97% lie, it wasn't half bad.

Yeah you sure proved that I was a condescending fuckhole. Way to go champ. I up voted you to prove my utter sincerity.

I can post whatever proof I can find, you'll likely go to a activist site for the rebuttal. Its like a programmed response. but here, this is a easy link for you to read if you are up to challenging yourself. [https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/09/03/cooks-97-consensus-disproven-by-a-new-paper-showing-major-math-errors/](https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/09/03/cooks-97-consensus-disproven-by-a-new-paper-showing-major-math-errors/) its an accepted peer reviewed paper that disproves the 97%. Its up to you to accept it.

Not using Darkmode when you post screenshots should be a ban-able offense... j/k Getting banned for trying to actually debate something seems to be a running theme. not sure how people become mods, I think it has something to do with getting a free lobotomy.

you mean like forcing people with healthy immune systems to get a vaccine that didn't stop it, or prevent its spreading? and then having them get 5 boosters, that still didn't affect the outcome in any meaningful way? I had COVID twice, I'm fat, diabetic a smoker over the age of 40 and it hit me less than a common cold. However my MIL has had it 4 times and she's vaccinated and boosted and gets laid up every single time.

there's an entire research paper published regarding that 97% consensus being utter bullshit, the scientists who objected to being included in the 97% were all pretty sufficiently silenced. The problem is the money for grants comes from the people who are profiting off the climate crisis to start with.