Im sure there was subversion, but one obvious difference is in the 60's they weren't looting cities and having nationwide riots. They also weren't overtly racist, which cannot be said for BLM.

BLM Inc. is a literal company they has employees who make a great living. They say they are Marxists openly. BLM targets businesses for their "support" if they dont capitulate they are faced with a PR nightmare akin to what Al Sharpton used to do, same tactic. You could say it marketing but really its fear - a big company does not give a shit about whatever nonsense BLM is espousing they simply want to sell, that is their function anything they do is to serve that and thats perfectly fine.

> that a civil rights movement is actually a racist, marxist multi-billion dollar corporation. But it is though.

I found that thread before coming here. WOW! reddit is going full 1984 on this one, they really are trying to shape a narrative of massive support, very odd.