>Simply put, liberals do not want black people and white people getting along. It’s far more insidious than that lmao. White people are getting demographically replaced, who gives a fuck about this shit?

Not to mention, IT users would fabricate ‘evidence’ by intentionally posting rule-breaking shit on alt-accounts to get material for r/inceltears or even to get incel subs banned. It’s extra funny when you notice that sub is full of many incels in denial and simps.

Lefties are that brainwashed that acknowledging the many flaws of multiculturalism is equivalent to being a klan member. I genuinely pity them, I can’t imagine thinking like that.

Not cowardly, tiring. Spending too much private time on reddit plebs is a waste of energy.

Being anti-Islam makes one “alt-right”? TIL I’m alt-right lol.

That’s 95% of political subreddits though. The sad reality is that mods can impose whatever arbitrary rules they want and ban on a whim.

The “straight” reddit cucks saying they would fuck OP to try and justify the post is plain embarrassing.

For those reading this thread, he didn’t rape the girl and hasn’t admitted shit.

I got permanently banned from r/soccer as well for “hostility, sexism and abuse” just because I call bullshit on the documents and think the woman wants a money top-up. They muted me from mod chat and refused to explain how violated the rules or was hostile, sexist or abusive. The majority of reddit is a far-left cesspool that immediately assumes rape accusation = truth (as seen by the adoption of the #MeToo movement). The way Ronaldo is being treated is disgusting, his reputation is being tarnished with no evidence. He won’t be found guilty and subsequently will not go to prison. But this doesn’t matter since reddit has already deemed him guilty already, future threads will be plagued with shitty, repetitive rape jokes. But yeah, the woman is somehow the victim after receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars and most likely, will get even more. >https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vzSRcsFV5DQ Furthermore, the alleged victim made it sound as if he was forcing himself onto her when the above video shows her groping Cristiano’s arse repeatedly. The other piece of ‘evidence’ used by the ‘innocent until accused’ crowd is the use of “no” and “stop”. Firstly, that’s a claim, his signature is nowhere to be seen and the document is about as reputable as me writing down “CR7 raped me after I said ‘no’” on my notepad. Not to mention, those words can be used during consensual sex, especially with a sensitive area that is involved in anal. E.g. “No, can we stop for a second” or just through the motions of the act if there is a painful or otherwise uncomfortable moment. There was no rape, just a consensual sex encounter that has been taken advantage of for money. This is my belief based on the lack of evidence and inconsistencies in her claim which has put it down to ‘he said vs. she said’. My thought process upholds the principle of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ and I will await until the conclusion of the case to brag smugly, if I am correct. Not that the court matters, when some of the public either don’t like CR7 and want him to be guilty (heaps of them of r/soccer, especially the Messi fans on various social media) or have an inherent bias for favouring female accusers.