>I never claimed FDA approval or anything like that. But they have to approve it. If it's going to be used as a treatment. There aren't any other choices. >"Low quality" refers to the post, not the drug. Ask them. Talk with the moderators of that subreddit. The subreddit didn't make the decision about whether the drug should be or shouldn't be permitted but the "quality" of the recommended treatment that would be linked to or included is probably their consideration. Not the quality of the post. That would be my guess. Read the subreddit rules. I bet that's it.

According to medical doctors - its low quality - according to this. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/ https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/product-safety-information/faq-covid-19-and-ivermectin-intended-animals Only the FDA makes decisions about efficacy or applicability. The Reddit subreddit is not at fault for making such decisions. Was there a question?

Nothing I said is incorrect. Yes, people knew less. But it has taken medical knowledge to find out. When people come in contact they spread the virus even if they don't die from it. The argument being made is incorrect. >Why punish 100% of people when only 1% are affected? That's the mistake.

> I think you’re assuming away facts that need to be debated. Hey. Except we don't get to debate if we're gagged. >precisely how the disease is and the correct public policy approach. Let me put it this way. If we were to follow what the AEI said in April a lot more people would be dead already. They're not medical doctors. And the fact is, medicine has been providing good advice and keeping people from dying as the president almost did himself... This is not something to fool around with. COVID-19 is not "the flu" and some bunch of enterprise advocates who haven't got a hair brain clue probably shouldn't be spattering reddit users with advice that will kill them. So if they get to do that I want to be able to argue with them. Because they're wrong. >Shrieking and using terms like “Koch brothers” i Don't know who is Shrieking >isn’t really a great proxy for thoughtful, Don't know who isn't being thoughtful. but that sounds like a personal tone that I don't use.

It appears that the website avoids media analysis.

I hope this gets fixed for you. What, by the way is "CA?" This? reddit.com/r/ca/

The message doesn't say all that. Is there another source document that specifies what these rules are? What the document says is simply that /r/the_donald has been "fostering an enviornment of threats and harassment toward users and antagonism toward other communities." While the purpose of the sub is to support President Trump, I can verify that it has instead been antagonistic towards communities that are not even on Reddit, communities that do need help but that already "Make America Great:" public research universities where 80% of Americans who earn degrees earn them and who produce research that gives America competitive advantage. I think if we are to make America great again that it doesn't help to push people into antagonism against what makes it great but that Republicans have underfunded for the past 17 years.