Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
> I challenge you to cite me any established pandemic protocol or epidimeological papers claiming it's possible to eliminate a pandemic through mandatory 2 week lockdowns.
> Even the experts that wanted 2 week lockdowns purported it was 2 weeks to flatten the curve - not eliminate it.
Reply to that for the lolz
1
12 May 2021 13:15
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
*
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
You're the straw man artist.
0
12 May 2021 13:12
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
You're batshit insane if you think that 2 weeks was to eliminate the virus. I challenge you to cite me any established pandemic protocol or epidimeological papers claiming it's possible to eliminate a pandemic through mandatory 2 week lockdowns. It's genuinely mind boggling you beleive that, you must have swallowed some serious pseudo scientific propaganda.
Go back to the articles during that time. Even the "experts" purported it was 2 weeks to *flatten* the curve - not eliminate it.
All Aus and NZ did is keep their populations at the beginning of the viral timeline, i.e. the pandemic has barely begun in these countries. They're facing the same problem regarding covid that the rest of the world was at the the beginning of 2020 right now, just equipped with experimental vaccines, a dilemma of of when to open borders, in the wake of being ravaged by lockdowns, and with an endless cycle of more lockdowns until they finally bite the bullet and accept they have to let the virus run its course.
1
12 May 2021 09:20
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
*
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
> It was always two weeks if everyone actually did it. You can't go around saying that cars are unreliable because people keep getting stranded when you pour sugar into their gas tanks. It's the fault of you and people like you that we didn't fix this problem 14 months ago.
What do you think waas the purpose of those two weeks? Do you actually think it was to eliminte the virus!?
1
12 May 2021 08:29
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
Don't give me that two weeks bullshit over a year into this nonsense.
You want to be scientific? I'll leave you with a couple suggestions:
1. Look up the actual fatality rate for covid: infection fatality ratio (IFR). Not CFR. You can't have a rational view on covid unless you know this.
2. Look up the average person dying of covid, specifically how old they are and how many comorbidities they have. You'll find the average age of covid death HIGHER than life expectancy for that country, making covid among the luckier ways one can die. You'll also find 2+ comorbidities. The CDC recently stated the average covid death had FOUR additional comorbidities.
3. A pandemic is nothing surprising. In 2019, it was an inevitable occurrence of the future. Thus there had been established protocols in place in pubic health (BaSed on ScIeNcE) in response to a pandemic. I suggest you find these and find where in any Western country's public health pandemic protocol were there lockdowns anywhere near in severity in which they've been implemented.
4. In order to determine whether lockdowns harm or benefit more, we must analyse how many life expectancy years they kill vs save. Keep in mind, the life of a 25 year old is vastly more valuable than the life of an 80 year old (average covid death). If a 25 year old loses 5 years of his life in some way due to lockdowns (damaged health due to drug overdose, domestic abuse, loss of 5 years of net worth), just because that person is technically alive, you can't discount or dismiss the damage done to him. That's worse than someone already past the human life expectancy dying from covid, cancer, and diabetes.
1
12 May 2021 06:05
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
*
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
That's a separate argument.
I'm referring to this logic specifically:
> The answer is yes, if leaving your house kills people, you should be forced to stay home.
Leaving your house necessarily "kills people" via flu and car accidents. Sure, the flu typically kills less than covid, but it kills nonetheless.
So do you acknowledge this is faulty logic or do you beleive we should be forced to stay home and not drive?
1
11 May 2021 13:30
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
The flu and driving your car kills people. What's your response to this? If different from covid, why?
Please don't report these questions as misinformation.
2
11 May 2021 13:03
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
Pour one out for us homies against lockdowns but stuck in lockdown states, though.
2
11 May 2021 02:43
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
*
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
I don't buy it. Asking questions is also implementing the Socratic method, or can just be sincere. That looks like it was written by someone just butthurt, akin to mentally ill people making up a wiki article for 72 genders.
2
10 May 2021 16:50
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
"+73,000 at Cowboys stadium last night... no masks, no Vax cards."
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/n8wmq9/73000_at_cowboys_stadium_last_night_no_masks_no/
2
10 May 2021 16:35
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
So high of you, make a baseless claim then not wanting to quibble when pressed.
2
10 May 2021 16:32
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
WTF?
5
10 May 2021 14:24
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
https://i.imgur.com/JDRb3p5.png
5
10 May 2021 13:55
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
This is the current state of Reddit: permanently banned from /r/pics for asking questions. The QUESTIONS were labelled as "misinformation" by the mod. So Orwellian.
82 61 comments 10 May 2021 13:52 u/Lockdowns_are_evil (..) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: Banned from /r/WTF for citing the CDC. Covid = cult
Is an np.reddit link okay?
/u/Tsurupettan
/u/xxb4xx
/u/NorseGodLoki0411
/u/publicmodlogs
1
25 Feb 2021 05:05
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Banned from /r/WTF for citing the CDC. Covid = cult
1 3 comments 25 Feb 2021 05:04 u/Lockdowns_are_evil (..) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: Why did /r/amitheasshole mods ban me for my post? I was just asking if I was the asshole for helping an old lady out of her chair?
Uh but I didn't wear a mask and I broke social distancing laws? Don't you care about the life of granny?
1
19 Feb 2021 02:43
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Why did /r/amitheasshole mods ban me for my post? I was just asking if I was the asshole for helping an old lady out of her chair?
https://old.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/lmo2w9/aita_for_helping_an_old_lady_out_of_her_chair_and/
> There was an old lady sitting down, we were inside in a restaurant. It was time for her to leave so she was trying to get up but struggling. So I went up to her and helped her up, helped her walk out and down the steps (just two) until she was on the sidewalk with her walker.
> She told me she was 87 years old as I held her hand to support her weight and slowly walk with her. I told her if we hold hands, I can't promise I won't fall in love. She laughed. By the way, we were both unmasked as well.
> Reddit, AITA?
0
18 Feb 2021 14:40
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Why did /r/amitheasshole mods ban me for my post? I was just asking if I was the asshole for helping an old lady out of her chair?
2 6 comments 18 Feb 2021 14:39 u/Lockdowns_are_evil (..) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: Mod from /r/TheWire is a total hero for banning me purely because of my username. Must be proud!
Nah, my username butthurt a mod
3
11 Feb 2021 16:04
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mod from /r/TheWire is a total hero for banning me purely because of my username. Must be proud!
You know, reddit is mostly a waste of life...
10
11 Feb 2021 14:18
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mod from /r/TheWire is a total hero for banning me purely because of my username. Must be proud!
Like I said, be skeptical and just go through the studies.
Or, you know, use some common sense and think about what happens when you shut down the global economy -- what literally sustains life on earth.
Btw, what do you think the mortality rate is?
4
11 Feb 2021 14:11
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mod from /r/TheWire is a total hero for banning me purely because of my username. Must be proud!
Subscribe to /r/LockdownSkepticism and be as skeptic of THAT sub as possible. Go through some top posts. It's very tightly regulated sub for quality.
5
11 Feb 2021 13:42
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mod from /r/TheWire is a total hero for banning me purely because of my username. Must be proud!
"....The fuck did I do?"
21
11 Feb 2021 11:35
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Mod from /r/TheWire is a total hero for banning me purely because of my username. Must be proud!
81 16 comments 11 Feb 2021 11:00 u/Lockdowns_are_evil (..) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
I'm in Aus, cunt
2
08 Feb 2021 12:26
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
The mandates are a problem, that's all.
1
08 Feb 2021 05:09
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
> ... They will come to understand the consequences in due time.
They won't, and I don't care what they think or trying to convince them anymore. It's all about survival now.
2
08 Feb 2021 03:09
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
links above
1
08 Feb 2021 03:08
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
> But they stop you from touching your face too
Bullshit. I've seen nothing BUT face touching from people who wear masks. Constantly adjusting them, pulling them off, putting them back on.
1
08 Feb 2021 03:08
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
Nice cherry pick. Now look at all the other countries and how cases spiked after mask mandates:
https://tomwoods.com/covid/
Regardless, this isn't the point of the post. The point is the bias censorship from public freakout.
1
08 Feb 2021 03:07
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
You're making bullshit claims, it's not my job to educate you, nor to I have the time. There are dozens of links above on the efficacy of masks on respiratory virus.
1
08 Feb 2021 03:06
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
Fauci himself March 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRa6t_e7dgI
Now he says wear two. What a cunt of a man.
2
07 Feb 2021 13:14
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
Thanks!
1
07 Feb 2021 12:19
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
block function is easier. I just block all the authoritarian propaganda subreddits: pics, politics, news, worldnews etc
7
07 Feb 2021 02:59
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
/r/PublicFreakout: Posting a pro-mask mandate government report? Top comment! Posting multiple scientific studies on adverse effects of mask use? Ban!
44 26 comments 07 Feb 2021 02:48 u/Lockdowns_are_evil (self.RedditCensors) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
Great write up. Thank
2
20 Jan 2021 15:59
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
/r/Futurology = socialists using new buzzwords
1
17 Jan 2021 13:43
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
Shocked but not surprised.
2
16 Jan 2021 16:50
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
It should be obvious I'm referring to prolonged mask use. What's your explanation of the harmful effects of prolonged mask use if breathing with masks is 100% a non issue?
This already sounds stupid. I'm over it. The study I linked is sufficient for me. Believe what you wan.
3
16 Jan 2021 16:49
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
True that. I thought at least /r/science won't censor reasonable discussion.
1
16 Jan 2021 15:18
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
They mandated it for hospitality workers and gyms. The former doing light cardio for 10 hours a day. The latter doing intense workouts. Retail workers, although not necessarily walking around all day like hospitality workers, are still wearing it for prolonged periods of time. This shortlist isn't exhaustive; use your imagination.
I think there are cons to mask use that vary with how long it's worn for. Think about it. There's a pocket of CO2 left inside the mask with each exhale, which is then inhaled in the next breath. Your quality of air is compromised.
Each individual should calculate the risk/reward and decide for themselves.
2
16 Jan 2021 12:20
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
Yes, and mask mandate skepticism.
3
16 Jan 2021 12:16
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
Thank you for not advocating coercive mandates.
Adverse Effects of Prolonged Mask Use among Healthcare Professionals during COVID-19
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bdea/3aef30775ad4505dc7a7c19e9b41ff89baef.pdf
3
16 Jan 2021 10:47
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
> And yes, mask wearing should be universal.
Nah, you don't get to force people to wear something they don't want to on their own property. Public property is debatable. I can cite you ~20 charts of cases spiking after mask mandates.
0
16 Jan 2021 09:50
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
Read the inb4
4
16 Jan 2021 09:49
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
/r/science censors discussion that isn't in line with the doomer narrative on covid
92 36 comments 16 Jan 2021 03:33 u/Lockdowns_are_evil (self.RedditCensors) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: /r/Coronavirus removes link to multiple studies of the profound positive effect of Ivermectin on COVID-19. Claims it to be "low quality content". Link provided below.
> But they have to approve it. If it's going to be used as a treatment.
>
> There aren't any other choices.
Yup, I agree and never claimed otherwise.
> Ask them. Talk with the moderators of that subreddit. The subreddit didn't make the decision about whether the drug should be or shouldn't be permitted but the "quality" of the recommended treatment that would be linked to or included is probably their consideration. Not the quality of the post.
Yes, they ended up clarifying that this was previously posted and provided me the link, so gotta give credit when it's due. Their initial mistake was removing it for "low quality".
1
05 Jan 2021 12:00
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/Coronavirus removes link to multiple studies of the profound positive effect of Ivermectin on COVID-19. Claims it to be "low quality content". Link provided below.
I never claimed FDA approval or anything like that. "Low quality" refers to the post, not the drug.
1
05 Jan 2021 11:46
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
> Because they feel safer having the government be in control.
Can't think of a time in the 20th century taht's ever gone wrong.
1
27 Nov 2020 14:11
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
Have you noticed how this is generally used?
They will take the worst people, the worst examples that oppose their views and elevate that to front page status. Things like Great Barrington Declaration will be actively censored, source: https://www.aier.org/article/reddits-censorship-of-the-great-barrington-declaration/
1
27 Nov 2020 13:30
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
What about lockdowns appeals to the left? The left used to have civil rights at the forefront (eliminate war on drugs, anti war) but that's just a fading memory now.
1
27 Nov 2020 13:28
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
> Also, https://gbdeclaration.org/
I 100% promise you, that I've had these crazy leftists dismiss GBD as "right wing white supremacists".
1
27 Nov 2020 13:00
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
You only learn from dialectics. You don't learn from being attacked with straw men, called a racist, called a science denier, etc, which is all they've done in my experience. This saves precious time, but you do you.
4
27 Nov 2020 12:54
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
> The decisions to lockdown and enforce curfews are proven to work.
If something works then you have to define a measurable goal.
What is that for lockdowns?
> But I guess if you don't trust math and science
This is a good example of arguing in bad faith. We both have opposing assertions, and we both claim scientific reasons. It's not polite to straw man, ad hominem, etc. and makes you look unintelligent.
2
27 Nov 2020 12:19
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
They rarely make /r/all but yes, those subs are arguably fully socialist.
4
27 Nov 2020 12:18
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
> The curfew rule isn't arbitrary. Neither is the threat of a lockdown. These are specific things, not arbitrary. Why do you think this choice is nonsensical?
Look up arbitrary.
> Personally I've been horrified by people packing bars and house parties in a completely unreasonable response to social distancing requests.
It's okay for you to be horrified by decisions other people take in their lives in response to risk. It's not okay for you to use force to imprison them in their homes.
2
27 Nov 2020 03:16
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
Filtering is not censoring.
2
27 Nov 2020 03:14
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
None of that shit is science based at all. Remember it all started with 2 weeks to prepare the medical system. Now any time cases go up (which is just a virus being a virus and humans being humans), even though deaths have no correlation, they lockdown. South Australia locked down hard over 17 cases.
Highly recommended: https://vimeo.com/483358807
4
27 Nov 2020 02:11
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
Lockdowns are a government policy response. Viruses don't shut people in their homes against their consent.
I'm bewildered that you see no distinction here.
5
26 Nov 2020 18:47
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
Leftist bias is reality?
I'm talking about people who aren't leftists having a better browsing experience. Seems futile to engage in any sort of discussion with them as they tend to engage in multiple logical fallacies, argue in bad faith, and just gang downvote against the narrative.
Lockowns are inherently political. I highly encourage non leftists to avoid these subs! :)
10
26 Nov 2020 18:40
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
I don't recall. It's either one of my personal filters I accidentally included or there was a leftist propaganda post I don't remember the details of.
1
26 Nov 2020 18:18
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
For starters, it's not in good faith to straw man and attack from the outset, as opposed to genuinely trying to understand the opposition's position.
Do you know how dialectics work? If not, I don't have the time to teach them to you, but you can research online.
9
26 Nov 2020 17:49
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
> Are you capable of discussing in good faith?
6
26 Nov 2020 17:47
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
I'm open to discussion in good faith with you right now. You seem incapable. Are you capable of discussing in good faith?
9
26 Nov 2020 17:42
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
Strange.
0
26 Nov 2020 17:27
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
Discuss in good faith if you want to engage.
6
26 Nov 2020 17:25
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
lol
8
26 Nov 2020 15:57
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
List of "non-political" subs that have front page level leftist bias. I've blocked these from my reddit feed and so can you (until the alternative is developed)
70 53 comments 26 Nov 2020 15:21 u/Lockdowns_are_evil * (self.RedditCensors) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: /r/MadeMeSmile: Providing reason, evidence, and statistics in a mature manner? FUCK YOU, BANNED
Virtue signal smiling
1
17 Oct 2020 11:39
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/MadeMeSmile: Providing reason, evidence, and statistics in a mature manner? FUCK YOU, BANNED
> Oh right, because saying "you can choose to believe this meme story at face value" doesn't imply that you think it never happened 🙄
It doesn't.
Racism? WTF? LOL!
10
16 Oct 2020 17:45
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/MadeMeSmile: Providing reason, evidence, and statistics in a mature manner? FUCK YOU, BANNED
> you were accusing OP of lying
Nope?
> VERY heavily implied it was the dogs who caused the injuries?
Nope? Not at all.
Demonstrate this with reasoning or fuck off with your fallacies.
4
16 Oct 2020 15:34
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/MadeMeSmile: Providing reason, evidence, and statistics in a mature manner? FUCK YOU, BANNED
UPDATE: The mods of /r/Mademesmile provided no explanation for the ban and muted me for asking.
14
16 Oct 2020 12:34
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/MadeMeSmile: Providing reason, evidence, and statistics in a mature manner? FUCK YOU, BANNED
This is a link to the comment, although it was censored before I could archive it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MadeMeSmile/comments/jc5avw/pit_bulls_always_gona_be_my_favourite/g8zs0rx/
5
16 Oct 2020 12:14
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors
/r/MadeMeSmile: Providing reason, evidence, and statistics in a mature manner? FUCK YOU, BANNED
57 14 comments 16 Oct 2020 12:12 u/Lockdowns_are_evil (..) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: My non-rule breaking comments are being shadow banned from /r/nottheonion, likely out of pure leftist butthurt from the mods
Update: permanently banned from the sub and muted from contacting mods. They claimed it was the auto spam filter. I guess that's why the superficial comment was allowed, and the critical was not, and why I was banned as a result. Yup, that makes sense.
3
11 Oct 2020 06:21
u/Lockdowns_are_evil
in r/RedditCensors