You're just way, way off on this. First of all, the CDC not only doesn't agree with you that pit bulls are disproportionately dangerous, it even helped author a document saying so: [A community approach to dog bite prevention](https://www.avma.org/public/Health/Documents/dogbite.pdf) Listed in the contributors to the task force there is "Jeffrey J. Sacks, MD, MPH ... representing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention." >When every study says it's true This is just laughably inaccurate. Here's the American Veterinary Medical Association: [Dog Bite Risk and Prevention: The Role of Breed](https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/LiteratureReviews/Pages/The-Role-of-Breed-in-Dog-Bite-Risk-and-Prevention.aspx) >Owners of pit bull-type dogs deal with a strong breed stigma, however controlled studies have not identified this breed group as disproportionately dangerous. And Dogsbite, far from being a neutral public education website, is [just a pit bull hate site](https://ethicsalarms.com/2015/10/20/unethical-website-of-the-month-dogsbite-org/) run by a dog bite victim [with a vendetta](http://btoellner.typepad.com/kcdogblog/2010/03/the-truth-behind-dogsbiteorg.html). And there are exactly zero credible, professional sources that support the idea that pit bulls are dangerous and should be banned. [All the expert sources say exactly the opposite.](https://www.reddit.com/r/AntiBSL/wiki/experts)