Agreed. You cannot be “forever alone” if you have legions of thirsty men men simping at your feet. With that said, the language used was unprofessional and immature. There are more mature ways to tell people to go to hell in such a way that they actually look forward to the trip.

Why are the mods so afraid of the truth? …because it violates the prevailing ideology, and commits heresy against doctrine.

Nice to know that facts, evidence and reality can be racist. You sound like a 60-iq moron. Clearly down to the limit where you barely have enough neurons to keep breathing. If you can’t even handle the real world, how can you be justified to moderate a forum?

>Im not a mod of anything and you totally misrepresented that guy who doesnt mind a muslim presence to make it sound like he is fine with radical islam I suggest you pick up a dictionary, look up the words ‘bigotry’ and ‘intolerance’, and point out exactly where I was bigoted and intolerant about not wanting child murderers and lawbreakers in my country. I clearly stated in the prior post (to the one that was removed) that *some* immigrants refuse to dispose of artifacts of their culture that are fundamentally incompatible with western culture and laws, and that *those* are the people I object to. That is not intolerance *or* bigotry, unless it is intolerance and bigotry to object to laws being broken and children being murdered *directly due to those anti-western cultural artifacts*. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. If you cannot follow Canada’s laws, you should go back to where you came from. That is not intolerance, that is not bigotry; that is plain, solid, common sense. To extend a metaphor: you don’t shit on the floor of a host’s living room, *especially* if they don’t allow it, regardless of how natural that might be to do in your own home.

>How does their comment have anything to do with approval of honor killings? Even my title does not say that. How could you have possibly gotten that? They banned me because I had the temerity to say that *some* foreigners behave badly, and therefore I blasphemed against leftist doctrine. According to the leftist narrative, all immigrants, illegal or not, behave perfectly, and if we have any problems with them it is because we are “culturally insensitive” and “racist”. Even when they kill their own children, it is our fault for being racist enough to object to those deaths, and it is not their fault for causing those deaths.

>A person can accept non extreme muslims being present and also be against honor killings, so yes you strawmanned the heck out of that guy by making that argument on his behalf Wow, more /r/canada mods percolating out of the woodwork with their alts/sockpuppets. Lots of hurt butts all around, I see! With that said, my initial post was *all about* accepting non-extreme foreigners and being against honour killings (including bad behaviour on the part of Hindus), so the only thing that I could have possibly been banned for is exactly what my title is all about. Ergo, not a strawman argument.

>Real world evidence can still be a strawman. You put an argument in someone else's mouth just to strike it down. Here's real world evidence: you don't know what the fallacy of false equivalency is. Here's a strawman: your inability to understand logical fallacy means you're incapable of rational discourse. Anyone incapable of rational discourse deserves to be banned from /r/Canada. Ah, so you’re an /r/canada mod under an alt/sockpuppet. Butthurt much about your intolerance and bigotry being on full display?

Real world evidence (the copious links in my post, to support my position) does not equate a strawman. You provided an excellent example of the fallacy of false equivalence, FYI.