Governments like the US and Canada are involved so politicians and the wealthy elite can gain financially from the purchase of arms and equipment on the tax payer's dollar. It's no different than the last two decades they've spent in the middle east. Not to mention the US government needing to support their installed puppet Zelensky. Opposing this doesn't mean supporting Russia but you'll have a hard time convincing the masses who think they accomplish anything changing their profile picture to support *thing in the news* on the regular.

Well at least he's giving us a warning first.

This is why I deny these permissions at all times. They're still going to listen but if they choose to use that data for anything but advertising purposes they've breached our contract, it also makes it inadmissible in court. It's not enough, but at least it's something.

Birdshot will do it.

I find them tedious on mobile.

Paying real dollars to avoid getting cancelled or corrected for things you never needed to say to anyone.

I frequently forget I'm permanently banned from a default (r/videos) because I responded to a comment asking about a fake 1-800 number from a scam call centre with the number that contacted me. Apparently this is considered doxxing and required an immediate permanent ban with zero options for recourse.

Yes.

That first tweet is so cringe I nearly had an aneurysm. What was your second comment. It no longer appears in the link?

Now how will the unemployed coal miners stream porn and dial-up speed?

It is humiliating to address the "cultural differences" that are forced labour camps. Honestly I wonder if modern wokies would still criticize Neville Chamberlain for appeasement policies when that's precisely what they're currently supporting.

This is like all the CBC videos YouTube pushes on Canadians. All see several thousand downvotes to a couple hundred up. All are unapologetically liberal. They spent so much effort faking actual votes to reflect them in internet votes.

It's obviously a lie to hide the coded message they put out. At least that's the impression that I get.

There's no reason why they can't have labelled advertised content that isn't significantly invasive.

Their following tweets mention it may have been someone's bad coding when trying to block an address and instead targeting the city name.

You're getting a little too close to the truth here. Can you throw some comments on racial privilege in there? Just something to obfuscate the argument and silence those in objection by hiring some ~~house n-~~ *minority representation*.

The wiki article on Chivalry has some arbitrary contributions to affiliate it with the KKK like: >"Many considered lynching chivalrous.[66]" There's a lot of modern opinion with questionable citation that seeps into the historical pages.

Well Snopes, Google, Reddit...

*corporate interests

Technically it was 2 street shitters and a boardwalk shutter.

Ironically most content I follow that would be dubbed "white supremacist" is just entertainment from Jews (and a Puerto Rican).

The big swindle was convincing all the decision makers in municipal governments and mid-size companies that it's "cheaper" than upgrading their servers. "It's okay, it's just all the data of your entire business. How could that possibly ever be ransomed back to you?"

Punch *Nazis! *Nazis is defined as people I personally disagree with and vilify.

>thought it was fake This has never stopped an AskReddit before.