Well that's not happening, so what's the next best thing?

Not really, but the website contains a short overview, and we've been discussing various details over at /r/raddi. I'm planning to compile some sort of guide in the future, but for now I'm able to keep up and answer all questions, so if you have any, let's hear it :)

Check out /r/RedditAlternatives but the fact is that the current situation isn't great. There's saidit.net, and more reddit clones, some running as Tor hidden services, but mostly they suffer from small userbase. But I'm afraid that centralized websites will inevitably suffer the same fate as Reddit once they exceed critical mass of users. But luckily lately there's been emergence of decentralized platforms, yours.org, minds.com, notabug.io, each approaching the issue in a slightly different way. And there are more platforms being actively developed, e.g. my [raddi.net](https://www.raddi.net).

I'm looking forward how will attitude of such people work on my [raddi.net](https://www.raddi.net) (once launched).

It did? Well, maybe I'm wrong about that then. EDIT: Seems like voting has turned the tide. Perhaps that's the effect of /r/all?

And look at the awesome brigade this thread is under, which is also disallowed by global rules here, yet nothing will be done about it just as well. EDIT: Seems like voting has turned the tide and corrected the initial brigade. Perhaps an effect of hitting /r/all?

Totally uncensored. Decentralized and distributed. Out of my control once up and running. Moderated by subscription (users subscribe to moderators they trust). With full local control to adhere to legal status (and removal) of data stored on your computer. See the site, it's going to be really simple thing. And I have also answered some questions in /r/raddi

Wow. I mean I did expect this to happen eventually, but I wanted to have my [raddi.net](https://www.raddi.net) ready when the purges begin. Time to make some radical shift in priorities I guess.

> What a fucking sad day for reddit when 4chan has a more appealing community. Yeah. Can't wait to see how will my [raddi.net](https://www.raddi.net) turn out in this regard.

People who don't like their opinions challenged equate *argument* with *fight* ...or even *hate* these days.

"discussion"

Wouldn't it be much more constructive to let someone reply and refute or refine the statement right there within the context?

This is one of the foremost reasons why I believe that users should consume moderator's work on per submission basis. Has one of the mods started deleting good content out of sudden? Unfollow. Poof and all his changes are reversed for me. Does my friend suggest different mod? Click follow. Poof and now I see much cleaner content.

Figuring out perfect conditions to filter out spammers is tricky. It's one of the difficult problems ahead of [me](https://www.reddit.com/r/raddi).

This has become one ridiculous tradition.

/r/uncensorednews perhaps

According to ceddit there's about 5500 comments removed now (out of 25000).

Seems like we really need uncensorable platform soon ;-)

It's, sadly, not a new thing. We've seen this several times recently. Moments like these motivate me to work harder and wish that I had more time to finish my platform (www.raddi.net (also [sub](https://www.reddit.com/r/raddi))) so that people could finally discuss everything uncensored.

> "We don't like free speech either..." Figures.