My original question was about innovation within the systems that are being discussed, in part because it high-lights an obvious contradiction. I thought this was obvious enough to not have to spell out. Innovation, IE expansion of IP/Patents that are working would appear to be dealt with very differently within the two systems discussed. I was hoping with the example I was giving that you would say something that would highlight a more specific example of how it was not contradictory. Instead I got snark. To which I replied with my own snark which is now devolving the conversation and not my intent. I can always use more comprehension which is why I asked a question in the first place. Good luck to you.

Anti effort, ant 🐜

How is that blatantly not true? Not a sarcastic question I am guessing you have specific set of things you’re thinking of in how RFK is not a liberal when he kinda text book from 30 years ago. I would love to get a genuine response. I am not intending to sound aggressive.

If you’re not interested in debating then don’t post. You didn’t give any good examples of how it may not be contradictory. You just tried to mic drop an opinion as fact then tell Reddit to not debate you. Go start a blog.

How does innovation within that industry? Who owns an improvement on an old idea that disrupts the market? Should Cabbies all get an automatic share in Uber and Lyft