This is silly semantics, and no they don’t. My dad wasn’t around when I was growing up. I didn’t need him to be there to realize how important that is. In fact, I’d bet everything I have that I realize the importance of it more than some typical spoiled redditor with both parents in some gated community.

What kind of weird and pathetic tactic is this? People don’t have to experience something to know how important it is to have. You guys always gotta try and gatekeep these discussions because that’s the only way you can “win” them.

You're right. It's not even close. The politics sub is way worse. It's supposed to be an unbiased place to discuss politics but instead has become a hate filled tin foil hat dispensary.

Talks about "conspiracy filled echo chambers", but yet posts on the politics sub. That's the same as how you guys try to paint Trump supporters as intolerant and racist, when the anti Trump weirdos themselves are way worse. Guess self reflection isn't really an option when you spend your whole life trying to pin your failures on something other than yourself.

>OKeefe is also being sued for misrepresentation, his Project Veritas videos became an absolute laughing stock online as he hyped the end of the Dem party. Cool, that's great and all, but I can't seem to get an answer on this. Regardless of OKeefe's reputation, how does he get people to admit to incriminating stuff on hidden camera? Are they role playing? Is it CGI? Maybe he has some type of advanced hologram technology? Super realistic masks and voice changers? >How in the fuck would a Medical Producer (who I don't believe works for the FBI, let alone deals with any journalistic tasks of the Russia case) be able to speak, let alone deny all of the allegations being investigated by the FBI? Cmon man. What? That's not the point. The point is that he is in the meetings with the most powerful people in the company, and he has insight on how they run the company. I would be surprised if the janitor or the new guy in the mailroom, didn't know how biased and manipulative the company is. >Calling other people shills because they want to have an intelligent, and open conversation about disagreements will never lead to anything. Do you also say that to people from the anti Trump side, who accuse anyone with a different opinion of being a Russian or a bot? You may even do that too (I don't do the whole digging through a person's comment history thing), was just curious because that never seems to be the case. >Edit: Soooo credible! I don't know if it's wise for your "side" to call out credible sources, since the majority of your talking points come from blatantly biased sources that cite unverifiable info from unnamed sources.

They got the support of billionaires and rich celebrities (well that and soccer moms and spoiled kids that go to $60,000 per year schools). Not really surprising that they could raise money.