That’s not an example of free speech but of a threat which falls differently under the law. Try a less extreme example

Generally yea free speech is freedom for consequences of that speech lol? Very bad point there. That is of course outside the laws that regulate it like hate speech. Also what he said wasn’t even false, because arresting people for dissenting opinions was something the nazis did

Yea arresting someone for search is bad even if it is something extreme as Nazi speech. People were allowed their opinions but that doesn’t mean they are allowed to physically act on them.

So you support censorship lmao?