http://archive.is/wLuz0 and the original had some reasonable (if heated) back-and-forth. Most of the original posts were nitpicking why certain subs were in there, and replies were given. Such as: >/r/pics has turned into 50% "r/pictures of anti-trump protest signs and magazine covers" >/r/adviceanimals has something botted to hell periodically, and /r/movies had more than a few early on when the spam groups were figuring out the new algorithm. and in response to an EnoughTrumpSpam mod's surprise that a defunct subreddit, /r/etsmods, was included >We have been *very* proactive in using the filtering feature. and on how it was found >I suspect it got swept up in the initial hunt for Brock's interns and became the basis of a filter list once the feature got added more generally. A question from someone out of /r/MarchForScience about why they were in there was >[Hold a march that wasn't really about science.](http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/04/the_march_for_science_was_eerily_religious.html) And yes, I know it's Slate. On occasion you find a diamond in a pile of turds.

This is exactly the right description. As for flavor, if you want more aggressive T_D supporters choose /r/AskThe_Donald, if you want a bit less acidic responses go for /r/AskTrumpSupporters.

Hmm, I wonder how long they'd be able to deal with themselves if Reddit wasn't around for them to be powermods on. Let's find out!