>If you honestly cannot see that, you have a problem and I hope you go get help for it because a well adjusted and mature adult who has their priorities straight doesn’t condone assault/political violence from anyone at all or think of it as understandable and/or negligible This is what I was referring to about the "everyone" and "morally bankrupt." So yeah, I can honestly see that we, as good, law-abiding people shouldn't throw milkshakes on people. But, I just don't care. I don't think it rises to the level to constitute "political violence." It's silly. People who do it are jerks, but they aren't violent. Sure, that's my subjective take on it, but that's because the concepts of both politics and violence are inherently subjective. There is no objective measurement you can use for either term. So, it goes back to my original point. Milkshaking isn't violence. It's annoying for the people are it happens to, but it's not like they're getting shot or run over.

That's a pretty big qualifier for saying that you seem to really subjectively pick and choose which instances of violence you care about. And if you wanna think that you can, just don’t pretend to care about political violence then Edit: My point is you have your own subjective qualifiers for what is acceptable political violence, but if anyone disagrees with you about something silly, then they must be morally bankrupt. And I reject that.

Are you saying you are against every form of political violence with no exception?

No, there's a thread about it