I agree with the sentiment. Take, for example, the respected Harvard researcher who we found out this past weekend was heavily pressured not to publish his study that showed that race did not predict police shootings.

I would argue that the opposite is true, specifically with climate change. The political 'solution' to it always seems to be some flavor of advancing a global Bolshevik-style centrally planned command economy. If I disagree with that political solution, I am labeled a climate denier.

> Doesn’t “scientific consensus” literally only mean the generally accepted theory within the community? Yes, unless the topic is climate change, gender, COVID-19, or social science. Then, 'scientific consensus' means that it was written by the hand of God on a marble tablet, and you are a heretic who must be punished for your lack of faith if you express any doubt regarding the data, methodology, or conclusions of The Science™.

Post the same thing, but replace "Christian Savages" with "Muslim Savages" and see how fast it is removed.

Unsubbed from that shithole years ago.

He will get a site-wide ban for 'harassing the mods'.

And don't get me started on fully semi automatic screw drivers. The danger they pose to Her Majesty's subjects is far worse than loose screws.