Pretty reasonable take

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Nord_Stream_pipeline_sabotage Untrue

["...there will no longer be a Nord Stream II, we will take care of that."](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSPfXLPUJHM) It's clear as a dog's bollocks. It appears a presumption of good faith has worn through. Good day

But capitulation assumes an authority or high ground. We blew up a Russian natural gas pipeline, then immediately assumed the #1 provider of LNG to the European Union, that's not very cricket. Spurious to suggest that Kremlin would sucker punch u.s. territory. Pearl Harbor happened in a pre nuclear world. In my view, an organization of, "collective security against the Soviet Union" has served its purpose. That is to say, NATO should have dissolved an appropriate time after the Soviet Union's dissolution. Therefore we should seek to minimize, rather than accelerate related military entanglements. I'm not convinced of your claim that Pearl Harbor was a 'capitulation to strongmen' coming to bite us in the ass. If it always happens, as you claim, can you give a second example of a strongman ass-bite?

It should ban itself for the rank irony in its name

Don't worry guys! It funds the military industrial complex that ensures the perpetuity of our involvement in such conflicts! Starting to feel bad for the 50centers that have to regurgitate these awful takes

Truth like poetry, and most people fucking hate poetry.

There is a paid campaign right now to astoturf reddit super hard, Harder than normal even. Their posts frequently end with nonsequitur partisan flagging, e.g. "We wouldn't be paying so much for McDonald's if it weren't for the terrorists in the republican party!"

Kind of on the nose