It's true. Trump has NPD, his ego can't take it when he's criticized. His sycophants follow his lead.

FAKE NEWS = News that makes Trump look bad.

Non-reputable sources are worthless because they either lie about the facts or intentionally misrepresent them. Critical thinking should have made you realize that. The Gate Way Pundit, isn't the other side to sources like New York Times and Washington Post. The closest conservative equivalent is the Wall Street Journal.

I can not argue with someone who only trusts fringe sources.

> In which case you would have to provide evidence they are disreputable and their evidence is false. I don't need to respond to a claim by a non-reputable source. Thegatewaypundit isn't reputable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit >Splitting hairs and once again, deflecting. You're focusing on a single very specific instance to try and disprove of all the other instances. You're not in the least bit trying to argue a point with intellectual honesty, you're just trying to be "right" rather than admit again, the obvious truths. It is important whether Obama ordered a wire tap on Trump's campaign, that's what Trump claimed. I think we can both agree that the truth matters. >There's no point in arguing with you any further, again you have no intention of being honest or learning anything. You are the one using fringe publications and forum posts as evidence. I don't care about winning, I just hope to open your eyes, even just a as to why Trump and places like Fox News spend so much time trying to delegitmize respected news publications.

> No, it's not an argument. It's Ad-hominem which is a fallacy attacking the person giving the argument or sources of evidence rather than the argument itself, only slightly better than "Yeah well, you're stupid!'. Not all sources are reputable. For example you can't use the National Enquirer in an argument. >There is no question Trump, his admin, and others were under surveillance at this point. Go educate yourself on the Susan Rice scandal, everyone admits it exists but argues whether or not it was legal or justified to do. >P.S. What's especially Ironic is that the last source I used was NYT themselves proclaiming "Wiretap data used in inquiry of Trump aids" a publication you just simutaniously said isn't credible (because I used it), and at the same time is a "respected publication" (because Trump attacks it all the time). Trump claimed that Obama ordered him to be wiretapped, which is false. "American intelligence agencies typically monitor the communications of foreign officials of allied and hostile countries, and so they routinely sweep up any conversations between American citizens and those officials — called 'incidental collection.' For example, it is routine for F.B.I. counterintelligence officials to keep the Russian ambassador under surveillance. Therefore, when Michael T. Flynn, Mr. Trump’s former national security adviser, spoke on the phone with the Russian ambassador during the presidential transition, the government intercepted that conversation because it was wiretapping the ambassador." https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/us/politics/fact-check-trump-misleads-surveillance-wiretapping.html >That's called cognitive dissonance, it's a form of willful ignorance where you ignore the obvious evidence presented to you and fabricate your own reality to protect your world view because it's too painful to do otherwise. One might even respond with calling respected publications "FAKE NEWS" or accusing the "Mainstream Media" in being involved in a conspiracy against Trump?

They automatically defend Trump no matter the scandal, they aren't real news and try to delegtimize any publication that actually reports it.

LMAO

Lost the popular vote and may have colluded with a foreign advisory to bring down his opponent. Not my President.

Sure it is. Your sources aren't credible so any "evidence" they post can't be relied on. Ironically, Trump calls some of the most respected publications "FAKE NEWS", he does this to delegitimize them in the eyes of his supporters thus insuring they don't trust when news negative of him is published.

Are you also going to source Breitbart? Because it has as much credibility as your sources.

When did any of those people claim Obama wire tapped Trump?

And now your spreading Trump's personal conspiracy theories. Obviously it's everyone else who's brainwashed.

I'm not the one who needs Fox News to lie to me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuwG75M5YHE

Not my President.

/r/The_Donald is filled with dishonest, brainwashed extremists who have little to no sense of morality, they care nothing for others or the truth. They constantly brigade other subreddits to spread their far-right propaganda (ex: Seth Rich) and spread lies of persecution.

You people are so delusional.

This post has to be ~~satire~~ FAKE NEWS.

Lies and disinformation are repeatedly being spread by /r/The_Donald, Breitbart and Fox News regarding the murder of Seth Rich. They're not "asking questions", they're trying to distract from the Russian investigation of Trump's administration.

Where to begin? Pizzagate, "FAKE NEWS", Seth Rich, Breitbart, DEEP STATE, etc. It's an extremely long list, I blocked /r/The_Donald a long time ago to keep it from infecting my front page.

What do you think Trump is being investigated for?

Please, they acted like victims long before that.

https://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2016/10/why-does-trump-project-so-much-a-hypothesis/504293/

Donald is the master projector.

Harassment and threats. That's why the mods got removed. >What extremism? Where to begin? Pizzagate, "FAKE NEWS", Seth Rich, Breitbart, "Corporate Media/MSM", DEEP STATE, etc. It's an extremely long list, I blocked /r/The_Donald a long time ago to keep it from infecting my front page.

I've said this in the past and I'll say it again. /r/The_Donald is filled with dishonest, brainwashed extremists who have little to no sense of morality, they care nothing for others or the truth. They constantly brigade other subreddits to spread their far-right propaganda (ex: Seth Rich) and spread lies of persecution.

REEEEEEEEEEE

I've said this in the past and I'll say it again. /r/The_Donald is filled with dishonest, brainwashed extremists who have little to no sense of morality, they care nothing for others or the truth. They constantly brigade other subreddits to spread their far-right propaganda (ex: Seth Rich) and spread lies of persecution.

I've said this in the past and I'll say it again. /r/The_Donald is filled with dishonest, brainwashed extremists who have little to no sense of morality, they care nothing for others or the truth. They constantly brigade other subreddits to spread their far-right propaganda (ex: Seth Rich) and spread lies of persecution.

You should meet this guy named Donald Trump.

Who were using the website to spread extremism and commit crimes.

The Trump voat page compared /r/The_Donald users to Syrian refuges.

> But they don't want to silence all opposing viewpoints Bullshit. That's why they constantly brigade.

It's also a source of extremist propaganda and conspiracy theories.

/r/The_Donald is the only one constantly breaking them. It's like a problem child complaining about always being punished.

Meanwhile /r/The_Donald gets its news from /r/The_Donald image posts.

It gives them leverage.

/r/The_Donald is filled with dishonest, brainwashed extremists who have little to no sense of morality, they care nothing for others or the truth. They constantly brigade other subreddits to spread their far-right propaganda (ex: Seth Rich) and spread lies of persecution.

Because /r/The_Donald is filled with dishonest, immoral extremists.

Seth Rich

I've said this in the past and I'll say it again. /r/The_Donald is filled with dishonest, brainwashed extremists who have little to no sense of morality, they care nothing for others or the truth. They constantly brigade other subreddits to spread their far-right propaganda (ex: Seth Rich).