Comment on: Reddit's Censorship of the Great Barrington Declaration (anti-lockdown declaration)
Here is a link to the declaration: https://gbdeclaration.org/
8
08 Oct 2020 15:21
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Reddit's Censorship of the Great Barrington Declaration (anti-lockdown declaration)
81 15 comments 08 Oct 2020 15:20 u/deep_muff_diver_ (..) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: Nothing to see here, just Chinese mods censoring negative news about the CCP.
Time to leave reddit, seriously. Where's the non-partisan alternative!?
2
07 Oct 2020 13:04
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mod of /r/coronavirus censors NYT post that finds 90% of people testing positive for COVID-19 barely had any virus in them
"Harrassment" god forbid the propagandists are subjected to any form of questioning
1
02 Sep 2020 08:29
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mod of /r/coronavirus censors NYT post that finds 90% of people testing positive for COVID-19 barely had any virus in them
And you claim to hold the same standard for the fear mongering opinion pieces? Think carefully about your answer before I go through the sub's top posts.
By the way, I posted a study there on how influenza re-emerged after 17 weeks of isolation. That was promptly removed, because it doesn't fit the lockdown narrative.
Your sub's chock-full of people espousing a severely irrational fear of the virus. That should be self-evident in the bias you espouse.
2
01 Sep 2020 10:24
u/deep_muff_diver_
*
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mod of /r/coronavirus censors NYT post that finds 90% of people testing positive for COVID-19 barely had any virus in them
Thanks!
2
31 Aug 2020 16:25
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mod of /r/coronavirus censors NYT post that finds 90% of people testing positive for COVID-19 barely had any virus in them
I made an appointment with a psychiatrist I used to see. He's only taking phone appointments, so I was skeptical, but relented upon the insistence of family members (I just have sleep issues).
Not only is he compromising on the quality of his treatment while still charging the same price, but his business is booming and, surprise surprise, he's a staunch supporter of elimination policies (think Victoria, Australia and New Zealand). Disgusting.
2
31 Aug 2020 13:53
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mod of /r/coronavirus censors NYT post that finds 90% of people testing positive for COVID-19 barely had any virus in them
All that ~~dribble~~ drivel and you still haven't provided a decent explanation for why you removed it. You're an authoritarian shill that must be profiting from propagandizing an irrational fear of the virus. Shame on you.
8
31 Aug 2020 13:49
u/deep_muff_diver_
*
in r/RedditCensors
Mod of /r/coronavirus censors NYT post that finds 90% of people testing positive for COVID-19 barely had any virus in them
94 18 comments 31 Aug 2020 05:24 u/deep_muff_diver_ * (self.RedditCensors) in r/RedditCensorsjoebiden.info and kamalaharris.info are being auto censored on Reddit.
139 29 comments 13 Aug 2020 03:56 u/deep_muff_diver_ (self.RedditCensors) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
> Btw, the mortality rate in my dad's community is terrible. About 25% are dieing if they get Covid.
Source
0
09 Aug 2020 18:26
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
> I don't think people are starving to death.
I'm referring to globally.
1
09 Aug 2020 18:25
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
Oh I didn't notice that it's from the UK. Thanks for pointing that out. Yeah we can only wonder where, I guess it's more indicative than confirming.
The subsidies are economic law, though.
1
09 Aug 2020 12:16
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
I don't know to what extent, but 9/10 being significantly under plus subsidising covid deaths would naturally result an oversupply.
1
09 Aug 2020 11:50
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
The former due to the latter
1
09 Aug 2020 11:49
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
The key is that the restrictions would impact preventable deaths.
Lockdown doesn't reduce preventable deaths unless the ICU is going over capacity.
"New York City spent $52 million on coronavirus hospital that served 79 patients "
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/new-york-city-spent-dollar52-million-on-coronavirus-hospital-that-served-79-patients/ar-BB170MU6
1
09 Aug 2020 11:28
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
Definitely stinks of government and media induced hysteria to impose authoritarian control over people.
1
09 Aug 2020 11:27
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
> I don't exactly get their conclusion that the limited access to healthcare reduced the numbers of deaths of other natural causes.
That is strange. Limited access to healthcare would increase deaths from other causes. You sure that's what was claimed? Perhaps that's what they meant.
1
09 Aug 2020 09:36
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
Or literally millions of people starving to death from the catastrophic economic damage of global lockdowns.
1
09 Aug 2020 08:57
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
In June, 9/10 of the top causes of death were significantly below average, whilst there's been a law enacted forcing a 20% higher insurance pay out for c19 deaths. What do ya think? There's also been people listed as covid deaths even though they were never test, although I don't recall the source but can search it if you require.
http://inproportion2.talkigy.com/cause_of_death_20jul.html
------------------------------------
Section 3710 of the CARES Act provides for a 20% increased in Medicare payments for COVID-19 diagnosed patient.
“SEC. 3710. MEDICARE HOSPITAL INPATIENT PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM ADD-ON PAYMENT FOR COVID–19 PATIENTS DURING EMERGENCY PERIOD. (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(d)(4)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(4)(C)) is amended by adding at the end the following new clause: ‘‘(iv)(I) For discharges occurring during the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B), in the case of a discharge of an individual diagnosed with COVID–19, the Secretary shall increase the weighting factor that would otherwise apply to the diagnosis-related group to which the discharge is assigned by 20 percent.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-116hr748enr/pdf/BILLS-116hr748enr.pdf
------------------------------------
Stephen Crowder has a good 'Change my mind' video on this topic, and he uses difference sources to come to the same conclusion.
2
09 Aug 2020 08:46
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
In June, 9/10 of the top causes of death were significantly below average, whilst there's been a law enacted forcing a 20% higher insurance pay out for c19 deaths. What do ya think? There's also been people listed as covid deaths even though they were never test, although I don't recall the source but can search it if you require.
http://inproportion2.talkigy.com/cause_of_death_20jul.html
------------------------------------
Section 3710 of the CARES Act provides for a 20% increased in Medicare payments for COVID-19 diagnosed patient.
“SEC. 3710. MEDICARE HOSPITAL INPATIENT PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM ADD-ON PAYMENT FOR COVID–19 PATIENTS DURING EMERGENCY PERIOD. (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(d)(4)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(4)(C)) is amended by adding at the end the following new clause: ‘‘(iv)(I) For discharges occurring during the emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B), in the case of a discharge of an individual diagnosed with COVID–19, the Secretary shall increase the weighting factor that would otherwise apply to the diagnosis-related group to which the discharge is assigned by 20 percent.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-116hr748enr/pdf/BILLS-116hr748enr.pdf
------------------------------------
1
09 Aug 2020 08:46
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
They used misinformation to enforce a lockdown which literally kills people.
2
09 Aug 2020 08:34
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
It's the authoritarian brigade wishing they could censor any critique of the "do anything to stop covid deaths even if it means catastrophe in every other facet of life" narrative.
3
08 Aug 2020 08:01
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Public Service Announcement: stop getting your news from /r/covid19 or /r/coronavirus -- they are heavily censoring any dissent on the narrative.
126 25 comments 08 Aug 2020 06:04 u/deep_muff_diver_ (self.RedditCensors) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: /r/coronavirus censors an author highlighting the inherent flaws in covid-19 testing, even though the author backs his assertions with reason and cited evidence.
Thank you for your response!
1
28 Jul 2020 03:39
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/coronavirus censors an author highlighting the inherent flaws in covid-19 testing, even though the author backs his assertions with reason and cited evidence.
> They should have left it up so that it could have been eviscerated for being the false and misleading paper it is.
My point exactly!
3
27 Jul 2020 17:44
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/coronavirus censors an author highlighting the inherent flaws in covid-19 testing, even though the author backs his assertions with reason and cited evidence.
It takes 30 seconds to skim to see what the article is about, and to see that it does indeed include citations.
If something is ridiculous, then ridicule it instead of banning it. Yeah, you're within your rights to censor it, but that censorship is suspicious or ignorant.
0
27 Jul 2020 16:41
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/coronavirus censors an author highlighting the inherent flaws in covid-19 testing, even though the author backs his assertions with reason and cited evidence.
> Most articles are framing and blaming whomever they can on the right.
This is 99% of reddit. Censoring anything against a left wing narrative is enforced in every which way except officially.
Have you also noticed how the reddit hive mind will cherry pick the worst representations (inarticulate, overweight MAGA hats) of people who oppose their leftist opinions (actual majority of population, including many intellectuals) and bring them to the front page to shit on and act above them? Very manipulative.
21
27 Jul 2020 11:54
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/coronavirus censors an author highlighting the inherent flaws in covid-19 testing, even though the author backs his assertions with reason and cited evidence.
This is the censored post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronavirus/comments/hye87w/flaws_in_coronavirus_pandemic_theory_author/
Proof of censorship: https://i.imgur.com/W86Eveu.png
4
27 Jul 2020 06:09
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
/r/coronavirus censors an author highlighting the inherent flaws in covid-19 testing, even though the author backs his assertions with reason and cited evidence.
131 16 comments 27 Jul 2020 06:07 u/deep_muff_diver_ (..) in r/RedditCensorsThe marxists mods at /r/humansbeingbros apparently support the assault of gay, ethnic minorities.
115 7 comments 03 Jul 2020 14:33 u/deep_muff_diver_ (..) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: Mods of r/conservative didn't approve post showing that 10 democrats and 27 republicans voted to Let the FBI Seize Your Online Search History Without a Warrant
Yeah
1
21 May 2020 08:45
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mods of r/conservative didn't approve post showing that 10 democrats and 27 republicans voted to Let the FBI Seize Your Online Search History Without a Warrant
'Boomer' itself a bullshit ad hominem. Who gives a fuck how old they are in reflection of their political views. Fucking retarded.
1
21 May 2020 06:26
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mods of r/conservative didn't approve post showing that 10 democrats and 27 republicans voted to Let the FBI Seize Your Online Search History Without a Warrant
We still have rulers. Democracy is a monarchy with smoke and mirrors.
3
21 May 2020 00:50
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Mods of r/conservative didn't approve post showing that 10 democrats and 27 republicans voted to Let the FBI Seize Your Online Search History Without a Warrant
It was never approved by the mods, i.e. censored.
1
20 May 2020 22:56
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Mods of r/conservative didn't approve post showing that 10 democrats and 27 republicans voted to Let the FBI Seize Your Online Search History Without a Warrant
119 14 comments 20 May 2020 12:16 u/deep_muff_diver_ (self.RedditCensors) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: /r/Imgoingtohellforthis banned! WTF! A fucking comedy sub!? Fuck reddit
Their having the right to it doesn't exempt it from criticism.
11
07 Apr 2020 08:48
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
/r/Imgoingtohellforthis banned! WTF! A fucking comedy sub!? Fuck reddit
114 14 comments 06 Apr 2020 14:46 u/deep_muff_diver_ (self.RedditCensors) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: /r/coronavirus censors a rational examination of the statistics behind COVID-19 which leads us to strongly consider the real harm has been caused by media hysteria and overregulation by the government
If anyone wants to read refutations on this article of me vs my fellow ancaps:
https://www.reddit.com/r/GoldandBlack/comments/fl6ozr/this_very_rational_examination_of_the_statistics/
1
20 Mar 2020 03:04
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/coronavirus censors a rational examination of the statistics behind COVID-19 which leads us to strongly consider the real harm has been caused by media hysteria and overregulation by the government
There was a hilarious thread sent to the karma moon about how the richest 10% of the world do the m0st harm for climate change. Pretty much every redditor is in the top 10% of the world lma0
5
20 Mar 2020 02:52
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/coronavirus censors a rational examination of the statistics behind COVID-19 which leads us to strongly consider the real harm has been caused by media hysteria and overregulation by the government
This link was removed when it was originally posted and resubmission is not allowed.
10
19 Mar 2020 09:35
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
/r/coronavirus censors a rational examination of the statistics behind COVID-19 which leads us to strongly consider the real harm has been caused by media hysteria and overregulation by the government
186 11 comments 19 Mar 2020 09:33 u/deep_muff_diver_ (..) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: BPT censors pretty straight forward, non-rule breaking comment because it doesn't fit their tribalist narrative
The daughter was daim fine. Fiona Applegate.
3
07 Mar 2020 02:28
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: BPT censors pretty straight forward, non-rule breaking comment because it doesn't fit their tribalist narrative
greatest of all time
2
06 Mar 2020 17:07
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: BPT censors pretty straight forward, non-rule breaking comment because it doesn't fit their tribalist narrative
Whose line? Haha one of the GOAT shows.
3
06 Mar 2020 17:02
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
BPT censors pretty straight forward, non-rule breaking comment because it doesn't fit their tribalist narrative
44 9 comments 06 Mar 2020 16:55 u/deep_muff_diver_ (self.RedditCensors) in r/RedditCensorsComment on: Some guy maturely and respectfully articulates his stance and reasoning? 1. Censor 2. Ad-hominem 3. Think you're a better person for it (The OP was a short woman saying short women have it just as bad as short men and to change her mind if anyone disagrees)
I know in Tinder 80% of women compete for top 20% of women, but the male:female ratio is whack. That's why hypergamy isn't a valid conclusion from this.
1
09 Oct 2019 20:12
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Some guy maturely and respectfully articulates his stance and reasoning? 1. Censor 2. Ad-hominem 3. Think you're a better person for it (The OP was a short woman saying short women have it just as bad as short men and to change her mind if anyone disagrees)
Very articulate and great elaboration. Thank you.
Are there any sources you have regarding hypergamy in human females?
5
09 Oct 2019 07:31
u/deep_muff_diver_
in r/RedditCensors