> I wouldn't mind seeing CU overturned either. That surprises me, but luckily I assumed rather than inferred, hence providing scope for you to correct me. >> Hell yes, I support a wide range of censorship. > Then you are my enemy. Fuck you. Moral extremism is something I just cannot get behind. The world is not black and white, and to claim that you disagree with all forms of censorship seems like immature hyperbole. Can you provide alink for your incarceration claim? A quick Google only turns up people convicted of Islamophobia related offences such as calling for genocide of muslims. I.e. hate speech which I think should, in certain cases - but not all, result in imprisonment. That study was from the Cato Institute, a center-right organisation.

Which laws have they broken? Reddit and google are private companies, they can remove, delete, show bias and preference as much as they want. You can choose not to use them, but this crying about it and calling for prosecution because your rules are used against you is absolutely hilarious. I'm looking forward to all of the obstructionist behaviours of the vile and disgusting Republican party coming back to bite them in the ass when the shoe is on the other foot... "What do you mean we can't confirm any judges in Trump's last year?!?! RRRReeeeeee" ​ I love it when i get downvotes and no real replies, it's so much more satisfying knowing people are pissed off, but have no valid response!