Pushing back? They said all posts with Israel and Palestine will be removed. This is assumed because it turns political. You immediately launch into a political temper tantrum while have all of your facts wrong. Israel has consistently tried to find a two state solution. Palestine refuses while also claiming all Jews should be exterminated. Read about Camp Davis 2000. That is more than enough of a serious reply for your self-righteous bullshit.

This isn't censorship. It is a user throwing a temper tantrum.

Is Gallowboob still around? I blocked him about 6 years ago. He holds the very high distinction of being the only person I've blocked on any social media platforms ever.

I have to assume that the mods of r/Libertarian aren't Libertarian; if there is one sub were banning users would be too ironic I would assume that one would be at the top of the list.

[Here is the response when I asked what I did wrong. ](https://i.imgur.com/b5OBWEe.jpg) It should also be noted that my political ideology has grown since I first joined Reddit +14 years ago. I still hold some strong Libertarian beliefs, but I have incorporated more "Socialist" themes into my own thinking. Personally I believe I am a "true ~scotsman~ libertarian" but the official Libertarian party has moved away from my thinking. I am still a registered Libertarian and I still vote for Libertarians and they are still the closest party that aligns with my own thinking. I also find it ironic that a Libertarian subreddit would ban anyone because the downvote button is in place, but like I said my own view of Libertarianism is off-stray as theirs.

Someone is on a power trip there. I just came to make my own post...

“Hey guys. I wish the President of the United States would day and I vocalized this on a subreddit. That subreddit banned me forever. What a fucking bunch of censorship assholes. Oh, by the way that sub hates the President more than anything else too!”

This kind of shit is retarded, on both sides. When a massive accomplishment happens in science, mathematics, philosophy, computers, etc from a large team the media and public ALWAYS pick someone to be their "leader". Sometimes it is someone who put a lot of work in, but not the most. It is completely random based on 'how much will people read this' and right known women in STEM is the hot button issue. If it begin with the dude being the leader then the militant feminists would be saying it was her the whole time. Whoever the leader the media or public pick is never, ever going to be right because in large teams like this with everyone who is just as smart as the next one are all working on the same goal which leaves little room for competition or leaders. They all most likely want to be seen as a team because without any of them we wouldn't have seen this picture and these people are the smartest of the smart. So can we stop this bullshit competition of who is one the team needed the most? Most likely not because the media will media, but we don't need to overshadow their amazing accomplishment by turning it into a political debate. THEY did a fucking great job. Lets just enjoy THEIR work.