u/fastbeemer - 19 Archived Reddit Posts in r/RedditCensors
u/fastbeemer
  • home
  • search

u/fastbeemer

0 posts · 19 comments · 19 total

Active in: r/RedditCensors (19)

  • ‹‹‹
  • ‹‹
  • ‹
  • 1
  • ›
  • ››
  • ›››
Comment on: Gab.com has been censored by their host, GoDaddy. A web site that simply says "Speak freely, there is no censorship here" is censored away.
Better response.
3 30 Oct 2018 19:41 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: Gab.com has been censored by their host, GoDaddy. A web site that simply says "Speak freely, there is no censorship here" is censored away.
Says the guy calling people retards. If you didn't have double standards you'd have no standards at all. The goddammed hypocrisy your side is fucking embarrassing. Let me see if I've got your side figured out: "Let's show them they are hateful by being hateful" but doesn't that just mean you're hateful too? "Let's show them they are racist by hating whitey" but doesn't that just make you a racist, because I don't have anymore control over the color of my skin than a black man does? "Let's show them they are sexist by hating men" but doesn't that just make you a sexist? Honestly your side is so hateful, so racist, and so sexist I'd be embarrassed if I were you. Luckily America is seeing through it finally, they see the hate on the left, the hypocrisy on the left, the extremist violence on the left, and sadly nobody has the brains to clean the left up. Mostly though, I'm glad you guys keep posting dumb shit like this, normies see it for what it is, and they don't like it at all.
19 30 Oct 2018 05:50 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/News is arbitrarily removing posts from their sub without any notification, citing a mysterious list of domains that are not allowed. They refuse to share the list or even hint at what could be on it.
Next you're going to tell me that disliking people based on an opinion they hold makes you a bigot. /s
1 11 Jan 2018 15:15 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: /r/nottheonion locks thread about asking errybody in Baltimore not to murder for one weekend when obvious conclusions are drawn.
Nearly all of our immigration laws are to stop Asians from coming here, the immigration act of 1924 capped immigration at 2% of each nationality, but forbid Asian immigration. The law that allows the President to restrict immigration was written in the 1800's to protect the US from a Chinese influx after the gold rush.
3 20 Jul 2017 07:12 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
First off you moron, there is no need for the unedited video, as I pointed out to you earlier but you are not smart enough to understand, CNN has already said the PV video is legitimate. Why the fuck would we need the unedited video when the subject has already stipulated that its correct? This does not diminish the fact that the video is out there, whether you can locate it is up to how good you are. Finding it evidently won't change anything, as CNN agrees that the video is legitimate. But mouth breathers like you are so gullible it won't matter now will it? The truth is an area you can't operate in.
2 28 Jun 2017 01:48 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
I'm just happy people are seeing you for the absolute moron you are. The unedited video is out there, keep hunting idiot.
1 28 Jun 2017 01:40 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
Nice try. From USA Today's article: "CNN says a clandestine video of one of the network's producers criticizing its coverage of President Trump is legitimate, further fraying an already strained relationship between the news network and the White House." Even CNN admits its true, thinks they can shrug it off. They believe you are sheep and will swallow anything they sell you.
2 28 Jun 2017 00:41 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
Haha, you're cute. Nice try on changing the subject. I don't need the unedited video because there is plenty of on the record evidence that also shows that CNN are stone cold liars. I don't even need the PV video at all. CNN are liars, and you are seriously gullible if you believe them. Your choice to be gullible or not, all the hoping in the world won't make Russia anything more than bullshit from butthurt libs.
3 27 Jun 2017 20:56 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
Why? I have substantiated my claim, I am willing to let it go to the jury now. I'm not arguing in an attempt to change your mind, I'm arguing for the couple dozen of people who read this and realize how terrible a point you've made. You have already demonstrated that you are beyond logic and reason, therefore there is no winning for you, but there are plenty of lurkers out there that I can convince. If you'd like to convince them I'd suggest you find the video and break down why it's incorrect, and you better find evidence of Russian involvement.
3 27 Jun 2017 20:10 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
The left won't cooperate, and the right doesn't need to. It would be smart for the left to cooperate because the Republican constituents will never vote Democrat, and they will only vote in more conservative Republicans in the primary. If you notice what I said, I stated that 'statistically speaking' FOX was the most fair and balanced, with the cited Harvard Study. You'll find that my statement is technically correct, which is the best kind of correct.
3 27 Jun 2017 19:50 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
I don't need to, I have the evidence that corroborates the story, I don't need the video to not look stupid. You need the video to be false or you will look dumb as fuck, so you have a vested interest in disproving it, I will just rely on Comey’s testimony, and the fact that CNN had to retract a story, and fired (resigned) three employees. Nice try though. The burden of proof is on you.
3 27 Jun 2017 19:45 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
Are you that dense or just that stubborn? I gave you plenty of FACTUAL reasons to believe the PV video. Besides the fact that if you truly cared you'd look up the unedited video, it's out there. I'm sorry but you are too hilarious not to respond to. Let me get this straight, the fact that Comey said that Trump has never been under investigation isn't enough proof to believe a video that says Trump has never been under investigation and they have made it up for ratings? The former FBI directors testimony corroborates the video evidence, and you don't want to believe it? I'm not even entertaining the argument you make because it's irrelevant. All known evidence points to the video being accurate! No evidence points to it being inaccurate. Stop lying to yourself man, have some fucking dignity. Stop carrying water for the loser left.
2 27 Jun 2017 19:39 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
Doesn't matter, the supporting facts are enough to substantiate the claim. It is more crazy that you are attempting to discredit the video based on a separate and unrelated case, and ignoring the mountain of evidence supporting the claim. Based on your flawed logic, everything CNN has said or published should be discredited because they had to retract a story. That is how your logic follows, correct? If not, why do you give CNN a pass and not PV? The only explanation is that one says what you want to hear, the other doesn't. Isn't the hallmark of journalism saying things the people don't want to hear? If that is the case, PV is definitely journalism for you.
10 27 Jun 2017 19:26 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
Yes, and it makes sense as the Harvard study pointed out, FOX is the most fair and balanced, so they'd have more coverage of the Tea Party movement. The Tea Party was not a response to Obama however, they were a response to inept establishment Republicans. They did most of their work in primary elections. You could say they were against the Obama agenda, but so were the Republicans, they formed because establishment candidates were not doing anything to stop it. The Tea Party and Trump supporters have both formed as a response to Republicans, not Democrats. You will see them again in 2018, because the Republicans control everything and are getting nothing legislatively accomplished. A full repeal of O-care is the only thing that will stop it.
5 27 Jun 2017 19:19 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
Key difference, nobody really pushed the birther movement in the media. The Tea Party came about from an entirely different area. There is absolutely no symmetry. We did not have "birther" hearings in the senate. The birther thing is more akin to Trump's taxes than it is to Russia, there is symmetry between taxes and the birth certificate.
5 27 Jun 2017 18:52 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
I'm not, I cited plenty of other evidence to demonstrate why my position is more likely correct. This is something you have not done. I guess you are resigned to always being the fool.
8 27 Jun 2017 18:48 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
You're kidding right? Do you own stock in CNN? I'm betting it's been a really bad week for you already. You are making yourself look silly, and destroying any personal credibility you might have. The facts: Trump has never been under investigation. CNN had to retract a story on Saturday. Three employees resigned over it. Harvard study shows a 93% negative bias on CNN against Trump. Stop letting CNN make you look like a fool, have some self respect. Can you come up with a single plausible scenario in which the producer saying Zucker told them to stop reporting on the Paris Accord and back to Russia could be taken out of context? Given the overwhelming factual evidence, it doesn't matter if it were taken out of context, CNN is worse than PV, and the race isn't even close. You are defending people who don't deserve to be defended. They've been conning the public for nearly three decades. They've been named in more lawsuits than PV ever has. They're known to discriminate. They are THE joke. PV isn't really breaking any news, we've known this, they are only confirming what the evidence has already demonstrated. They aren't actually bringing anything new to the table. I know it must suck being a liberal right now, Trump has never been under investigation, Hillary, Bernie, Lynch, and the Obama DoJ are under investigation. The world's been turned upside down for liberals, but you don't need to be a sheep any longer.
8 27 Jun 2017 18:07 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
Take all known evidence as a whole, including Comey's testimony, it doesn't really matter if PV is credible. The video provided, combined with the evidence at hand, lends to the credibility of the claim regardless of the source. We know from sworn testimony that the president has never been under investigation, that right there is enough to lend credibility to the idea that CNN is conning millions of people to push their ratings and narrative. I'd entertain your opinion more if the PV video were the only evidence of what CNN is doing, but taking everything on the whole, your opinion is most likely flat wrong.
7 27 Jun 2017 17:36 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
Comment on: r/politics keeping the PV video covered up
Do you also down vote CNN videos and stories? They have a proven history of heavily editing and falsifying sources.
11 27 Jun 2017 17:26 u/fastbeemer in r/RedditCensors
  • ‹‹‹
  • ‹‹
  • ‹
  • 1
  • ›
  • ››
  • ›››

archive has 9,592 posts and 65,719 comments. source code.