> WE CANNOT TELL YOUR INFLICTION I can't tell if you actually think that's the correct word or if you're a New Zealander.

No, there's no contradiction in thinking that a stateless society, or a society with a very weak and limited state, could have the means of production controlled by decentralized groups of workers. That's what libertarian socialists have advocated, ever since the term 'libertarian' came into political theorizing. It might be foolishly utopian, but it's not self-contradictory.

>Those are plato's morals, equal to anyone else's. ??? You think the article I sent is about Plato?

>Socialism is impossible without an imposing government. That's what libertarian socialists claim is false. They think decentralized groups of workers can control the means of production. They might be dead wrong about that, but the view isn't self-contradictory. Different socialists have very different ideas on the role of governments in their ideal non-capitalist society.

Are you under the impression that free-market capitalists were the first political theorists to use the term 'libertarian'?

*egregious

> You need to research philosophy a lot more my friend. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-realism/

But on your view, colonialism is equal to anti-colonialism, right?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism