No. You’re just lying. In fact it’s glaring that you’re lying because “mass incidents of threats towards violence complete with longstanding encouragement from the mods” isn’t a thing that one just “sees” unless you’re performing targeted surveillance on a handful of individuals in unison. So yeah, no, you didn’t “see” shit.

I don’t know why you hate gay people so much

Point made

>I saw it. No you didnt

Uh huh. I’m sure that’s your reason

And that point should be whatever we disagree with, on a case by case basis!!!

Yeah no. Didn’t happen.

Thats called communist.

You're right. Socialists defend communism.

I have yet to witness the Troll who does 15 million dollars worth of damage.

He's the same white guilt pissbaby that banned me for saying "Nice culture" on a fight video.

> Technically if you farted that’d just simply be a fart joke. Farting isnt a joke. Its just farting. Also, your wiki link disproves your claim in the first sentence. Why did you even paste it? >A joke is a display of humour in which **words are used within a specific and well-defined narrative structure** to make people laugh and is not meant to be taken seriously. **It takes the form of a story, usually with dialogue, and ends in a punch line.** Thats not a pun. I literally just told you: **A pun is wordplay**. It's just a play on words. It is not a joke. It actually only fits TWO of the 6 criterion for GTVH and thats language and logic. You seem to think that anything that makes you laugh is a joke. Thats not how jokes work. Making a funny sound isnt a joke. Farting isn't a joke. Puns aren't jokes. Screaming loudly isn't a joke. Watching a fat person fall off a roof isn't a joke. Making a funny face isn't a joke. All these things will make you laugh and all these things are funny, some of them might even BE DESIGNED to be funny. But they aren't JOKES. Literally the definition of the two words, pun, and joke, are two different things. You can't say that all pizzas are fruit just because they both go in your mouth.

>Puns are considered jokes, though. Again, they aren't. Thats why they're called puns and not jokes. If I say "Hey, you're punbelievable", I didn't just craft, construct, set up, knock down, or deliver a joke. I didn't take your brain anywhere with a humorous intent. All I did was recite a figure of speech. Thats all a pun is: a figure of speech. It's word play. It exploits definition or similar sound. Thats it. I made a sound with my mouth and you reacted to it. I can fart, thats a sound, and you could laugh, thats a reaction, but that isn't a joke either.

> Furthermore, what about puns, or jokes that have the butt of the joke be some inanimate object or social construct, such as Mondays at work or something? Well puns aren't jokes. They're puns. And as far as the butt of the joke being about mondays, for example, unpacking the punchline reveals the target. Case in point, the monday joke will be funny, but WHY do mondays suck? Karen in Accounting. Or Boss Bill Lumburgh. Or even deeper than that: and inanimate object. Your shoes are inanimate. If I make a joke about them, its at your expense. Make sense? Every joke. always going to be at someone's expense.

> Technically speaking, not all humor is designed to do so. Theres a pretty sound theory that EVERY JOKE is actually shadenfreude. Think about that for a minute. I didnt agree until I really thought about it. Every joke is always at SOMEONES expense.

All humor is "designed to piss someone off" Brittle baby bitches should get the fuck over it. Left can't meme; thats not our fault.

They didnt lose money because WPD existed, dude. The didnt ban it due to revenue. They banned it because the shooting got posted there, and they don't want to be complicit in a way where it was looking like 4chan was going to be for the shooter announcing it on 8chan. Which is also ten levels of dumb. They were covering their ass, which is perfectly acceptable, but watching a gore video doesn't mean you endorse violence.

So observing shit now means full endorsement. Makes total sense.

>Someone please explain to me how a person endorsing you makes you at all like that person Because the left is full of fucking retards thats why

You were probably banned by that dumbfuck nerd AntonioVenice or whatever his name is. Dudes a mod on every sub like that and he takes the internet fuckloads too seriously.

repealing the 2nd amendment = "the right thing"? riiiiiiiiiight

he's 18, and he's out there spreading a political message. If he's going to lecture adults who are much smarter than him, he doesn't get to put on the "Im just a kid" hat when the adults yell back. Sorry no.

>takes TYT seriously. >judges peoples "thought process"

>takes TYT seriously >tells people to leave their bubble Hooo boy.

Except I don't "wonder how some people can be liberals" and TYT is not "the other aisle".

> You should consume a healthy diet of a diverse collection of political ideology. TYT isnt a **healthy** dose of anything.

>You’ve never heard of a liberal listening to Ben Shapiro because you don’t expose yourself to the opposite side like I do. I would argue that I almost exclusively expose myself to the opposite side. Like we're literally having this conversation. >I also listen to TYT You shouldn't. Even before you get into where they stand on the issues, it should be apparent that they're all wildly uninformed partisan whiners. There's a reason Jimmy Dore has distanced himself from Cenk and Ana.

I suspect you might not be liberal then. I've never heard of a liberal listening to Shapiro. Joe Rogan, sure, but it sounds like you're Libertarian.

Oh. Gotcha. Well, to be fair, before that dumbdick mod threw a redpill in your mouth, you were posting in a sub that regularly calls anything left of Stalin "alt right", so at least now you're questioning their thought process. You'll find us a much more accepting bunch because proper opposition and challenging opinions is important.

This is called the beginnings of the red pill. Now all you need to do is realize that everyone you're calling "alt right" and "white supremecist" arent actually either of those things but at least you're beginning to see why we can't vote for anything that ever helps the left.

/r/bestof is a fucking anti-trump obsessed circle jerk shithole anyway. You're not missing anything getting banned from that stupid ass pussfest.

Anytime fam

not anymore. The left pretty much muddied the already-watered down pool. We don't really care about being called racists anymore because now EVERYTHING is racist, so we're like Okay cool I guess.

From what I hear, theres a significant portion of the LGB that wants to remove T from it. LGB is about sexuality and the oppression thereof. T has always been about gender, and a lot of them feel that the inclusion of T conflated their sexuality with the mental illness that is gender dysphoria.

The whole sub is a group of bots and shills attempting to convince the other bots and shills that theyre the majority of the country, without realizing they're all just bots and shills. It's like taking two iphones and having Siri talk to itself back and forth, except with this, its zero sum, and both Siris are trying to convince the other Siri that they are human beings.

the_donald isn't trying to pretend to be even a single percent of anything that it isn't. The same can't be said about....well, the rest of the default subs

Technically, there's nothing wrong with this. CNN is a tabloid.

[Here's when he initially admitted it](https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/comments/6as7w6/confession_from_exmoderator_and_bot_master_of/) and stipulated to his collusion with Snus. The second relevant post is difficult for me to find, as both Snus and Barawo33 are now account suspended, so I have no post history to be able to search through, but essentially, it implicates Barawo33 in the involvement and continuation with the bots as well.

Except he got caught, and the guy who made the bots admitted he made them, put them to use, and was specifically requested to do so by mods, so actually yes in this case, the correlation is the causation.

Not completely on topic but those mayors are fucking idiots if they think thats a good idea

science is honestly just as bad as politics

No they dont.

Good fucking god, the shills are hittin this thread hard.

You don't belong on this sub. Like at all.

I like to consider the new age perception that they are not locking us out, but rather they are locking themselves in.

I gotta say. Good. Being banned from those places is a badge, really.

Yes. They're terrorists.

Because reddit is owned and run by cucked faggots

Heres an extra bonus and why /r/bestof is a pointless stupid fucking sub. [The guy admitted MAT is cucked with bots](https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/comments/6as7w6/confession_from_exmoderator_and_bot_master_of/)

k great. Bye

There have been posts with an impression rate of 90% of the subs total subscribers in under 2 hours of it being posted, with upvotes going from 2 digits to 5 digits within the span of a half hour. I mean, if it weren't being manipulated, we would see it happening ANYWHERE else on reddit (with the exception of the other anti trump subs that are being botted).

Thanks for coming and posting this, but you understand that there statistically HAS to be vote manipulation happening, right?

k great. Bye

hahahaha. Jesus you're ridiculous. You gotta go, man. Just go. I'm not interested in this, in the least, with you.

Yep. Have a good day.

>Very republican. What a profoundly stupid fucking thing to say.

> And I won't argue with your point that the liberal ideology is dying So then why did you even bother with any of this? Just go.

Personally, I don't believe she got 3 million more votes, but it doesnt matter because popular vote is a talking point for losers. As far as him talking about > and the side that won 48/50 states among millenials.. and >won literally every demographic except white men I dont know what the fuck he's talking about and why any of that shit matters.

Yes SIGNIFICANT botting. As in "contextually related to the conversation we are currently having" We have Brick Bot, a bot that gives you a brick to add to Trumps Wall. We have Coat Bot, a bot that gives every patriot a coat. I think theres a "Bill Clinton is a Rapist" bot. And I think theres also bot that reminds us how many miles the trump train has taken. Those are bots, but those are not the bots that we are talking about. Theyre just gags. You're talking about Pro-Trump inflation bots, of which TD doesn't have. There's no evidence of it, and you're more than welcome to scrape the sub (as several people do every day) for the data and show evidence, but you won't find any because nobody has. The only shady bots in TD belong to the /r/marchagainsttrump guys and Shareblue and theyre used to downvote every thread and every comment. And those are not our bots.

Theyre not doing it for a candidate who already lost. Theyre doing it *against* a candidate who already won.

Thats three posts, you idiot. And thats US upvoting.

Thats us. We upvote literally everything there because of the downvote bots brigading us every hour of every day. So we have to upvote everything in there as we read it. "Sort by Controversial" in TD is completely useless.

I mean you [literally did the same thing.](https://www.reddit.com/r/RedditCensors/comments/6alcv3/evidence_of_marchagainsttrump_moderator_using_5/dhga918/) So yes, he did need to.

You understand that has no relevance on a national level to the fact that liberal ideology is dying, right? You basically just made the argument "Hey. liberals exist". Like...ok. Good job, fam.

T_D doesn't bot. There are bots in there, but they aren't ours. Theyre downvote bots. T_D gets data scraped all the time and they never find evidence of any significant botting. T_D doesn't even need bots. The numbers there are huge to begin with, but more importantly, why WOULD T_D bot? Trump won. There's no incentive to do it, and nobody who would be interested in financially backing it.

>They always respond with "well did you ever think people just really hate Trump?!" They get very triggered when I respond with "You have to REALLY hate Trump a lot to be able to summon the ability to create 7 submissions in 1 second"

>is there anyone who actually thought all those anti trump subs were real? Yes. Every useful idiot on the left.

Its Soros funded, so yes. Both

Pretty sure T_D is scraped every day for bots, and the only thing they find are MAT's downvote bots. Other than that, TD is legit. Oh, that and theres 6 million subscribers.

Im fascinated when the other side INSISTS that TD is all bots. This, by the way, based solely on the fact that they just CAN'T believe that we have that many numbers. No evidence. Just a refusal to believe it. Meanwhile, someone is scraping the TD sub every single day, and everything checks out. The only bots they find are anti-trump downvote bots. So the bots in TD arent even our bots. And we get accused of astro turfing. Typical leftist projection

Same. Im addicted to hate watching

Its not humanly possible to post 33 posts in 1 second. You have to read to learn things.

massive pullouts, or fraud charges. Reddit is far too deep in for Spez to pretend he doesn't know about the astroturfing here.

Were literally in a thread about one side overwhelmingly faking identities and votes, and you immediately jump to "DURR the side with 3 million more votes".... Fucking seriously?

Fuck I love this comment

Yes. Seriously

Not comparatively. Spez already got caught hiding the TD numbers, and MAT got caught being an almost entirely bot populated sub. I mean shit, trump won dude. We don't need bots. We had the votes. More importantly though, "they did it too" isn't actually an argument. We're adults. I shouldn't have to tell you that two wrongs don't make a right. Supposing even in the wildest fantasy that TD is a bot sub, which it isn't, that doesn't make MAT legit. If you want to complain about TDs bots, scrape the sub, find whatever evidence you can and make a thread about it. This thread, however, is about MAT being almost entirely fake

The bots in T_d are not our bots. They're downvote bots. It's constantly scraped to prove this. TDs posters are legit.

I think its hilarious. They have so little support and groundswell on the left because of their fucked and dying ideology that they have to fake their own existance.

Finally found it. This guy used shitloads of autism to parse this data, and the results that came out are impossible. [Take a look](https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/69i20k/definitive_proof_of_massive_upvote_manipulation/)

You mean the fake, astroturfed, populated ONLY by bot account subs that only a mere 2 days ago, were all proven to be fake, astroturfed, and populated ONLY by bot accounts? Yeah.

All of the mods on Reddit are pissbaby scrubs, and reddit is just another bullshit tear pillow for antifa faggots and whiny cunt trust fund leftists to continue sucking Obamas dick, and jerk themselves off at the thought of ushering in communism. Honestly, fuck spez and fuck reddit, and fuck psuedo-intellectual teenage hindsight politicians who pretend to know a thing of what they're talking about

Why even have a sub when you censor that heavily? Just write a blog, at that point: you'd be respected SO much more for it.

Jesus Christ why even have a sub