The sad thing is that you can't come up with your own insults, you have to reuse ones coined by the_donald. Whether any of you all admit it or not, the_donald won. Their legacy will live on here on Reddit long after you all finally succeed in ousting them. And you all should feel pathetic for wanting to squash a community you could easily ignore, simply because their opinions don't align with yours.

I can't find a single truthful comment in your statement. Par for the course for the left these days.

Believe it or not, we exist. I also voted for Bernie in the primary and Trump in the general. It's called being a single-issue voter, and that single issue is to remove the establishment's stranglehold from our political system. Both of them promised that.

Oops, wrong person. Sorry.

You missed /r/tinytrumps

They can't win unless the deck is stacked against their opponent. Hell, even then they can't win, because Trump still got elected.

Have you ever gotten a death threat for expressing an opinion? Now imagine getting them hourly. That's the life of a TD mod, even the women like OhSnap. Tim Poole has even stated that he will no longer be covering political events in the US because of the amount of death threats he gets from the left, plus the fact that they've actually started attacking him physically simply for covering the news fairly. And he stood side-by-side with these same people during Occupy Wall Street.

You're conflating civil disobedience with actual misbehavior.

Fine, whatever numbers they claim, the_donald's numbers are comparable to politics. Yet it's amazing how often politics reaches the front page, with multiple threads, while the closest the_donald can get is page 10. It truly amazes me how many people claim they're for fairness and equality, who also have no problem shitting all over community opinions they don't like, and call for them to be censored and banned.

I've been following the_donald since it's inception, first as a hater, then as a community member (during my pre-Bernie to post-Bernie transition). The only times rules were flagrantly broken was in response to the rules being applied unfairly. In fact the unfair application of the rules is what led me to start being sympathetic toward them and their cause. I may be a leftie, but I always thought that lefties were for fairness, equality, and freedom of speech/expression. I guess those qualities no longer exist on the left, because all I see these days are them wanting to squash any opinion that doesn't agree with their own.

His parents haven't said anything. The "family spokesman," who happens to be a crisis management PR guy from the DNC, keeps castigating everyone who tries to link Seth Rich to the leaks. As far as we know they've convinced the family he had nothing to do with it, and if his family are also Hillary supporters, they may not want the stigma of him having torpedoed her candidacy. There could be a number of reasons why they don't contradict the 'official' narrative.

Well, you're correct that it's not "proof," but why call it a "botched robbery" if there's no sign of a robbery? A botched robbery would be killing somebody to take their stuff (his things would be missing), not killing somebody and not taking their stuff (he still had $2,000 worth of money, jewelry and his cell phone on him). As Jimmy Dore says, "why not call it a botched rape?" because there was just as much evidence that they didn't rape him as there was that they didn't rob him.