Leftist bias controlled by neolib/centrist authoritarian mods and manipulated by paid for posts/votes/comments out the corporate center center-right. Despite Reddit largely having a leftist bias in terms of users, what does it tell you when actual leftists/progressives get attacked/downvoted/censored/banned over being critical of corporate centrists dems and narratives pushed by them and the national security state / military industrial complex?

Please do not conflate progressives with far-left. Progressives are not far left, they are leftists. It's liberals voteDEM / vote blue no matter who and idpol progressives who are 'rabid' and pro / enablers of authoritarianism and tribalism/group think. Liberals are often moderate dems or essentially centrists but pro-corporate / big tech censorship / imperialism etc. I would never call libertarians 'liberals.' That is a slap in the face to libertarians. Tulsi is a good example of a libertarian leaning leftist/progressive.

I didn't have this issue. Try the Redditisfun app.

>Rabid leftist... Well, rabid liberals and neoliberal/centrist propaganda... Leftists/progressives are often silenced by automod or downvoted into oblivion when they dare criticize corp centrist dems and dem party leadership and elite or even liberal MSM. They often get attacked and accused of being Trump supporters/running interference for Trump and spreading qAnon and Russian disinfo for posting unflattering facts about Biden, Pelosi etc.

If you're not toeing the line, you're our enemy. If you threaten the status quo, you're our enemy. If you question the 'official' narrative and impede our gaslighting, you're our enemy. If you bring up unflattering/inconvenient facts about our corp centrist dem ~~leadership~~ overloards/yaas queens, you're our enemy and we'll ruin your reputation and work to make sure you don't win your election. But unity and don't be divisive!

Alright but that's totally subjective. Like I don't think Greenwald was griefing or intending to grief. I think he had valid points - points which were corroborated by evidence and supported by other journalists. Of course people in those threads would still claim that Greenwald was lying and spreading disinformation, but it looks to me like he wasn't and I'd argue that it's the users trying to discredit him, who are posting the misinfo/disinfo.

>It looks like you mostly just reposted Glenn Greenwalds tweets Not exactly true but it *is* mostly related to Greenwald and Assange, as I said and that isn't against the rules. >and almost everything you've recently posted there is some sort of greifing. Rule 3 in /r/Journalism That's not true. Where did I grief? Please link to it because I don't recall ever griefing anyone. I remember responding to people who were attacking me for posting this content or Greenwald etc - both of which is against the rules. Edit: Do you think those people got banned for attacking journalists and users? For being uncivil? I doubt it. They likely reported me and the content I was posting to get me and it removed. I mean these users also post false and misleading info (some of which appears to be copypasta) but I don't know that *that* breaks the rules, but the aformentioned behavior and rule breaking is pretty blatant, but mods never seemed to do anything about that. You can go and look through each comment thread of each post I made there and it will corroborate whalt I've said above. The worst thing I ever did there was criticize MSM, as far as my rule breaking goes and I want even aware I couldn't do that at the time.

No offense taken and yeah I see a lot of left-wing subs appear to have been taken over/manipulated by efforts out the corporate-center and they got casuals and idpol wrapped around their fingers (and so tribalized and blindly obedient) attacking not just the right and independents but alsk progressives who dare criticize dem party/leadership. Combine that with McCarthyism, group think and vote manipulation, and what a terrible recipe for healthy discourse.

Not that I disagree with you but I didn't think that sub was the type to ban people for posting content that was critical of media, left or not. Like I said, I had posted stuff related to Greenwald and Assange before and I wasn't banned for it then or told it was not okay. I have also spent time in a number of threads where I've found myself needing to explain my political leaning after being accused of being a Trump supporter or Russian troll. In the end though, they of course don't believe me or they stick to their guns at least that I am a useful idiot who spreads disinformation. I do believe those particular people are hopeless and a disgrace to their progression. I mean the mod who perma banned me is also a disgrace in my personal opinion. I mod a sub and I don't remove people for differences of opinion. If they break the rules, they would not get a perma ban unless it was something serious like threatening violence or being racist etc

I don't think that's the case. I'm a progressive and was a registered democrats for years. Those users I speak of behave like moderate/neoliberal/authoritarian dems. They push centrist and intelligence community narratives/talking points and attack anyone who questions those narratives. Any inconvenient truths are dismissed as lies and disinformation.

Today I posted https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1321462730251972608 but you can also check my post history. I've posted there before.

Fuck both of those subs and their tyrannical mods.