I just checked and you are not admin shadowbanned, never mind about that theory

Shadowbans can be done by admins, and admin shadowban is outside moderator control

maybe they thought the gun reference was a threat? I don't; think they are banning talk of the massacre

Where is the sitewide violation here? Was OP ban evading?

Your username is "newaccoutnIwasbanned" so I suspect you are really banned for ban evasion and they said violent content for whatever reason

WTF is this comment?

I was just wandering if the mods actually said anything about it

Did the moderators say something about that?

Was any reason for removal given?

But all lives matter was only banned for being unmoderated

>purporting that a civil rights movement is actually a racist, marxist multi-billion dollar corporation. Who was doing this?

Thanks for understanding, if someone makes a comment that is mostly ok except for an insult at the end I will usually remove it and tell the user that I will reinstate the comment if they edit out the insult

I get where you are coming from, but on my sub some politics or controversial stuff is within the topic of discussion, so I can't remove it, but when people start personally attacking others it leads to more people doing it, and shifts the conversation from talking about a topic to talking about each other, which is a form of off-topic conversation and something I have seen myself on similar subs with more lax moderation Basically I remove insults not because I don't want one person to be offended, but because insults serve no legitimate purpose and leas the conversation off topic >you must be very careful to remove *every single instance of this uniformly* \- and that never seems to happen. This is very important, and unfortunately rare, you are right

You did end it with a personal insult, so mabey that was the reason for the removal? I am not fan of censoring opinions, but on the sub I mod I will remove any comment that calls another user names

Exempels? I'm not challenging this, I just don't know of any examples of the left being for rape or racial and religious violence

>Doesn’t matter if it’s fake or not WTF?

This looks fake, and I just realized it is [https://www.reddit.com/r/AntifascistsofReddit/comments/gua2ff/hey\_just\_curious\_but\_im\_pretty\_sure\_this\_account/](https://www.reddit.com/r/AntifascistsofReddit/comments/gua2ff/hey_just_curious_but_im_pretty_sure_this_account/)

It's not asking for advice, and is therfore off topic for that sub

From wikipedia, with sources >In August 2017, Shah retweeted and liked a tweet from a 'parody' account claiming to belong to Labour member [Owen Jones](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Jones) that read: "Those [abused girls in Rotherham](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal) and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity".[\[35\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naz_Shah#cite_note-rotherham-35) After realising the account was not Jones' and re-reading the tweet, Shah deleted the retweet and unliked the original tweet. A spokesperson said: "This was a genuine accident eight days ago that was rectified within minutes."[\[36\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naz_Shah#cite_note-yahoosun-36)[\[37\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naz_Shah#cite_note-tanda-37) Shah also pointed to her record on challenging abuse.[\[35\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naz_Shah#cite_note-rotherham-35) In April 2018, following [Winnie Madikizela-Mandela](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnie_Madikizela-Mandela)'s death, Shah paid tribute by tweeting an image incorporating Mandela's quote: "Together, hand in hand, with our matches and our [necklaces](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necklacing), we shall liberate this country."[\[38\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naz_Shah#cite_note-auto1-38) She later deleted the tweet.[\[39\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naz_Shah#cite_note-39)[\[38\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naz_Shah#cite_note-auto1-38) > >In July 2018, Shah was appointed Shadow Minister of State for Women and Equalities.[\[34\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naz_Shah#cite_note-BBCJuly2018-34) > >Shah was re-elected as the MP for Bradford West at the [2019 general election](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_United_Kingdom_general_election) with a majority of 27,019.[\[40\]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naz_Shah#cite_note-40)

That is the same mod who banned be for saying that a doctor refusing to see an unvaccinated kids is unethical because it is denying medical care to a kid to punish the parent

This may be reportable mod abuse, mods are not supposed to ban people from subs unles sthe banned person broke the rules on that sub

Wishing death on someone is grounds for a ban, they didn't ban you for not liking him, they banned you for wishing death on him

what is he getting suspended for?

I thought you were saying that is wasn't nazis

They don't tell you what ban you are evading?

>**I was trolling** Okayyy.... than why are you complaining about being banned???

R science always removes stuff, it doesn't look like a clear agenda, more random

I see your post

They remove large numbers of posts for no clear reason, it don't seem ideological

Can you elaborate?

Why did they remove it?

Can relate, I once issued a username ban for an "incitement to violence" which turned out to be a reference to a song (yes I rescinded the ban as soon as I realized)